504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411476)
1. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bite force and its association with stability following Class II/1 functional appliance treatment.
Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 22828079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value of masseter muscle thickness and bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment: a prospective controlled study.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 25582592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masseter muscle thickness as a predictive variable in treatment outcome of the twin-block appliance and masseteric thickness changes during treatment.
Kiliaridis S; Mills CM; Antonarakis GS
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 Nov; 13(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 21040463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Growth modulation using functional appliances--cephalometric predictors of successful response.
Kumar SA; Shetty KS; Prakash AT
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e50-9. PubMed ID: 23646338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of severe Class II division 1 malocclusion: a case report.
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Sundari KK
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 22372276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.
Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One year treatment effects of the eruption guidance appliance in 7- to 8-year-old children: a randomized clinical trial.
Myrlund R; Dubland M; Keski-Nisula K; Kerosuo H
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 25005108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children.
Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stepwise advancement Herbst appliance versus mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Treatment effects and long-term stability of adult Class II patients.
Chaiyongsirisern A; Rabie AB; Wong RW
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1084-94. PubMed ID: 19852598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
