504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411476)
21. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maintenance of a deep bite prior to surgical mandibular advancement.
de Coul FO; Oosterkamp BC; Jansma J; Bierman MW; Pruim GJ; Sandham A
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 19737779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fixed functional therapy with an anterior bite plane.
Zaboulian J; Ghassemi B
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 25745703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Treatment effects of a twin-force bite corrector versus an activator in comparison with an untreated Class II sample: a preliminary report.
Dalci O; Altug AT; Memikoglu UT
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 24968645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances.
McGuinness NJ; Burden DJ; Hunt OT; Johnston CD; Stevenson M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 21392692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study.
Lund DI; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 9457025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.
Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Uribe F; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):718-27. PubMed ID: 23194014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.
Cacciatore G; Ghislanzoni LT; Alvetro L; Giuntini V; Franchi L
Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1010-7. PubMed ID: 24665887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 25820407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
