These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411476)

  • 41. Cephalometric changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions after functional treatment with twin block versus myobrace appliances in developing skeletal class II patients: a randomized clinical trial.
    Madian AM; Elfouly D
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):998. PubMed ID: 38093237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Two-phase treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion with the combination of the twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear.
    Lv Y; Yan B; Wang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):246-55. PubMed ID: 22858335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance.
    Jacob HB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Buschang PH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The efficacy of Hybrid Hyrax-Mentoplate combination in early Class III treatment: a novel approach and pilot study.
    Katyal V; Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Darendeliler MA; Sampson W; Drescher D
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 27468596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions.
    Yüksel S; Kaygisiz E; Ulusoy C; Keykubat A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 20053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
    Das UM; Reddy D
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A cephalometric study of Class II malocclusions treated with mandibular surgery.
    Burden D; Johnston C; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17208097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C; De Sousa AP; Grobéty D; Mavropoulos A; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
    Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cephalometric evaluation of maxillary retrognathism cases treated with FR-3 appliance.
    Biren S; Erverdi N
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1993 Sep; 1(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 9582640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
    de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of class II and class III dentofacial deformities under orthodontic treatment on maximal isometric bite force.
    Trawitzki LV; Silva JB; Regalo SC; Mello-Filho FV
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):972-6. PubMed ID: 21440242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Relapse and stability after mandibular setback surgery one year postoperatively: a retrospective study.
    Halvorsen ET; Beddari IY; Schilbred Eriksen E; Boe OE; Wisth PJ; Loes S; Moen K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jun; 72(6):1181.e1-11. PubMed ID: 24831939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.