These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411476)

  • 61. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correction.
    Phelan A; Tarraf NE; Taylor P; Hönscheid R; Drescher D; Baccetti T; Darendeliler MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):759-72. PubMed ID: 22640678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
    Mariani L; Maino G; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
    Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
    Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The impact of functional jaw orthopedics in subjects with unfavorable Class II skeletal patterns.
    Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20974448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Fränkel II appliance. A prospective controlled study.
    Silvestrini-Biavati A; Alberti G; Silvestrini Biavati F; Signori A; Castaldo A; Migliorati M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 23270288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR; Lima DV; Freitas KM; Janson G; Henriques JF
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Treatment of Angle Class II/1 malocclusions with the Herbst appliance].
    Soytarhan A; Işiksal E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 2101668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Assessment of mandibular growth and response to functional appliance treatment in prepubertal patients with different auxologic categories.
    Celli D; Gasperoni E; Oliva B; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 20529625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Late adult skeletofacial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: a 32-year longitudinal follow-up study.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Hashemi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25533068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Gencer D; Yuksel S; Atalay Z
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 24274958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Factors related to stability following the surgical correction of skeletal open bite.
    Ito G; Koh M; Fujita T; Shirakura M; Ueda H; Tanne K
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24968647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Rapid palatal expansion in mixed dentition using a modified expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cozza P; Giancotti A; Petrosino A
    J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11395527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.