These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Conducting a meta-analysis: basics and good practices. Cheung MW; Ho RC; Lim Y; Mak A Int J Rheum Dis; 2012 Apr; 15(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 22462415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. Parker RI; Vannest K Behav Ther; 2009 Dec; 40(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19892081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing among techniques for quantifying single-case intervention effectiveness. Manolov R; Solanas A; Sierra V; Evans JJ Behav Ther; 2011 Sep; 42(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 21658534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs. Gillett R Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research. Tobler N NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():342-403. PubMed ID: 9243541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Issues in applied statistics for public health bioterrorism surveillance using multiple data streams: research needs. Rolka H; Burkom H; Cooper GF; Kulldorff M; Madigan D; Wong WK Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1834-56. PubMed ID: 17221940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures. Pustejovsky JE Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 29911874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advances in meta-analysis as a research method. Beard MT; Curry EL; Edwards K; Adams BN ABNF J; 1997; 8(5):92-7. PubMed ID: 9386389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of sources of variability on sample sizes required for RCTs, applied to trials of lipid-altering therapies on carotid artery intima-media thickness. Gould AL; Koglin J; Bain RP; Pinto CA; Mitchel YB; Pasternak RC; Sapre A Clin Trials; 2009 Aug; 6(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 19667027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs. Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs. Campbell JM Behav Modif; 2004 Mar; 28(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 14997950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data. Vickers AJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology. St-Pierre NR J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):741-55. PubMed ID: 11352149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]