These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21411481)

  • 1. Effect size in single-case research: a review of nine nonoverlap techniques.
    Parker RI; Vannest KJ; Davis JL
    Behav Modif; 2011 Jul; 35(4):303-22. PubMed ID: 21411481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U.
    Parker RI; Vannest KJ; Davis JL; Sauber SB
    Behav Ther; 2011 Jun; 42(2):284-99. PubMed ID: 21496513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs.
    Brossart DF; Vannest KJ; Davis JL; Patience MA
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2014; 24(3-4):464-91. PubMed ID: 24499350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A generalized least squares regression approach for computing effect sizes in single-case research: application examples.
    Maggin DM; Swaminathan H; Rogers HJ; O'Keeffe BV; Sugai G; Horner RH
    J Sch Psychol; 2011 Jun; 49(3):301-21. PubMed ID: 21640246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conducting a meta-analysis: basics and good practices.
    Cheung MW; Ho RC; Lim Y; Mak A
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2012 Apr; 15(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 22462415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs.
    Parker RI; Vannest K
    Behav Ther; 2009 Dec; 40(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19892081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Choosing among techniques for quantifying single-case intervention effectiveness.
    Manolov R; Solanas A; Sierra V; Evans JJ
    Behav Ther; 2011 Sep; 42(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 21658534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The metric comparability of meta-analytic effect-size estimators from factorial designs.
    Gillett R
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):419-33. PubMed ID: 14664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research.
    Tobler N
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():342-403. PubMed ID: 9243541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues in applied statistics for public health bioterrorism surveillance using multiple data streams: research needs.
    Rolka H; Burkom H; Cooper GF; Kulldorff M; Madigan D; Wong WK
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1834-56. PubMed ID: 17221940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures.
    Pustejovsky JE
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Apr; 24(2):217-235. PubMed ID: 29911874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals.
    Hedges LV; Pustejovsky JE; Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Dec; 4(4):324-41. PubMed ID: 26053946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advances in meta-analysis as a research method.
    Beard MT; Curry EL; Edwards K; Adams BN
    ABNF J; 1997; 8(5):92-7. PubMed ID: 9386389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of sources of variability on sample sizes required for RCTs, applied to trials of lipid-altering therapies on carotid artery intima-media thickness.
    Gould AL; Koglin J; Bain RP; Pinto CA; Mitchel YB; Pasternak RC; Sapre A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Aug; 6(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 19667027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured Rater x Ratee designs.
    Hönekopp J; Becker BJ; Oswald FL
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 16594768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical comparison of four effect sizes for single-subject designs.
    Campbell JM
    Behav Modif; 2004 Mar; 28(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 14997950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.
    St-Pierre NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Apr; 84(4):741-55. PubMed ID: 11352149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research.
    Berkeljon A; Baldwin SA
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):511-8. PubMed ID: 20183404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.