BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21412090)

  • 1. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oral contrast media for body CT: Comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification.
    McNamara MM; Lockhart ME; Fineberg NS; Berland LL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 20966319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intravenous contrast agents for CT studies in children.
    Cohen MD; Herman E; Herron D; White SJ; Smith JA
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov; 33(6):592-5. PubMed ID: 1449887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. A double-blind randomized study comparing an aqueous solution of amidotrizoate, an aqueous solution of iohexol and a viscous solution of iohexol.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 8369192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D; Sheth C; Eisenmenger L; Mignogna E; Winter T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Bach DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the effect of positive and negative oral contrast agents on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan.
    Sun XG; Huang G; Liu JJ; Wan LR
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009; 12(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Iodide mumps after intravenous and oral administration of contrast medium.
    Linn JF; Fichtner J; Düber C; Hohenfellner R
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1774. PubMed ID: 8863604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal trauma: use of oral contrast material for CT is safe.
    Federle MP; Yagan N; Peitzman AB; Krugh J
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 9314968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-absorbable fat-dense oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E; Borgis KJ; Rinast E
    Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1563426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
    Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution.
    Miller SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):959-61. PubMed ID: 9124149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oral contrast media in CT of the abdomen. Iohexol of different concentrations as a gastrointestinal contrast medium.
    Lönnemark M; Magnusson A
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jul; 36(4):396-8. PubMed ID: 7619619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy.
    Chang KJ; Rekhi SS; Anderson SW; Soto JA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 21160430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT method for visualization of the appendix using a fixed oral dosage of diatrizoate--clinical experience in 525 cases.
    Giuliano V; Giuliano C; Pinto F; Scaglione M
    Emerg Radiol; 2005 Jul; 11(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 16133622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.