893 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21412155)
1. The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.
Aronoff JM; Freed DJ; Fisher LM; Pal I; Soli SD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):468-84. PubMed ID: 21412155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of binaural functions in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Chan JC; Freed DJ; Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):296-310. PubMed ID: 18569102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):101-114. PubMed ID: 34133400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.
Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Sheffield SW; Teece K; Olund AP
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 24356514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Availability of binaural cues for pediatric bilateral cochlear implant recipients.
Sheffield SW; Haynes DS; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25751696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
Kerber S; Seeber BU
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective measure of binaural processing: Acoustic change complex in response to interaural phase differences.
Fan Y; Gifford RH
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109020. PubMed ID: 38763034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Ching TY; Incerti P; Hill M
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 14770014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.
Goupell MJ; Stoelb CA; Kan A; Litovsky RY
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):895-905. PubMed ID: 29337763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating long-term effects of cochlear implantation in single-sided deafness: a best practice model for longitudinal assessment of spatial hearing abilities and tinnitus handicap.
Gartrell BC; Jones HG; Kan A; Buhr-Lawler M; Gubbels SP; Litovsky RY
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25158615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.
Ma N; Morris S; Kitterick PT
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):248-59. PubMed ID: 27116049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing.
Schoof T; Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):1017-30. PubMed ID: 23363118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
