These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21412304)
1. US free-speech law offers protection--at a price. Samuel Reich E Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7338):276-7. PubMed ID: 21412304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research. Abbott A Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Whistle-blower claims his accusations cost him his job. Reich ES Nature; 2011 Jun; 474(7350):140-1. PubMed ID: 21654778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world. Guston DH Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry. Protti M J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Through the gaps. Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7416):335. PubMed ID: 23002451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Whistleblowing in biomedical research: report from a workshop. Mishkin B IRB; 1982 Feb; 4(2):8-9. PubMed ID: 11658314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy of researchers versus public's right to know their names. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2005 May; 20(5):8. PubMed ID: 16175715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hostile reception to US misconduct report. Wadman M Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):639. PubMed ID: 8649502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower. Malek J Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):115-29. PubMed ID: 20461568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case. Dalton R Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Unrealistic' misconduct plans under fire. Wadman M Nature; 1996 May; 381(6580):263. PubMed ID: 8692255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities. Wright DE Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]