These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants. Nishi A; Christakis NA; Rand DG PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171252. PubMed ID: 28231296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation. Gallo E; Yan C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(12):3647-52. PubMed ID: 25775544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner's Dilemma. Gracia-Lázaro C; Ferrer A; Ruiz G; Tarancón A; Cuesta JA; Sánchez A; Moreno Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Aug; 109(32):12922-6. PubMed ID: 22773811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Group-size diversity in public goods games. Peña J Evolution; 2012 Mar; 66(3):623-636. PubMed ID: 22380428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coevolution of public goods game and networks based on survival of the fittest. Ren G; Liu L; Feng M; He Y PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204616. PubMed ID: 30252900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Baldassarri D; Grossman G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jul; 108(27):11023-7. PubMed ID: 21690401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen. Pleasant A; Barclay P Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):868-876. PubMed ID: 29708860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games. Hackel J; Yamamoto H; Okada I; Goto A; Taudes A PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249217. PubMed ID: 33852605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement Learning Explains Conditional Cooperation and Its Moody Cousin. Ezaki T; Horita Y; Takezawa M; Masuda N PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Jul; 12(7):e1005034. PubMed ID: 27438888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditional strategies and the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games. Szolnoki A; Perc M Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2012 Feb; 85(2 Pt 2):026104. PubMed ID: 22463276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Social experiments in the mesoscale: humans playing a spatial prisoner's dilemma. Grujić J; Fosco C; Araujo L; Cuesta JA; Sánchez A PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13749. PubMed ID: 21103058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game. Huang K; Wang T; Cheng Y; Zheng X PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120317. PubMed ID: 25781345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Average abundancy of cooperation in multi-player games with random payoffs. Kroumi D; Lessard S J Math Biol; 2022 Sep; 85(3):27. PubMed ID: 36094659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games. Kümmerli R; Burton-Chellew MN; Ross-Gillespie A; West SA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jun; 107(22):10125-30. PubMed ID: 20479253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trust-based partner switching among partitioned regions promotes cooperation in public goods game. Kang H; Wang M; Shen Y; Sun X; Chen Q PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253527. PubMed ID: 34181692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]