These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21412969)

  • 1. An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for participatory decision making under uncertainty: an application to groundwater management.
    Farmani R; Henriksen HJ; Savic D; Butler D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 21412969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Bayesian belief networks for dealing with ambiguity in integrated groundwater management.
    Henriksen HJ; Zorrilla-Miras P; de la Hera A; Brugnach M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jul; 8(3):430-44. PubMed ID: 21702081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Site-specific updating and aggregation of Bayesian belief network models for multiple experts.
    Stiber NA; Small MJ; Pantazidou M
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1529-38. PubMed ID: 15660609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guided adaptive optimal decision making approach for uncertainty based watershed scale load reduction.
    Liu Y; Zou R; Riverson J; Yang P; Guo H
    Water Res; 2011 Oct; 45(16):4885-95. PubMed ID: 21783223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stochastic hydro-economic model for groundwater quality management using Bayesian networks.
    Molina JL; Pulido-Velázquez M; Llopis-Albert C; Peña-Haro S
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):579-86. PubMed ID: 23202563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management.
    Henriksen HJ; Barlebo HC
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Sep; 88(4):1025-36. PubMed ID: 17601649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bringing diverse knowledge sources together--a meta-model for supporting integrated catchment management.
    Holzkämper A; Kumar V; Surridge BW; Paetzold A; Lerner DN
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 96(1):116-27. PubMed ID: 22208404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of water quality management with a systematic qualitative uncertainty analysis.
    Chen CF; Ma HW; Reckhow KH
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Mar; 374(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 17258295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes.
    Gonzalez-Redin J; Luque S; Poggio L; Smith R; Gimona A
    Environ Res; 2016 Jan; 144(Pt B):15-26. PubMed ID: 26597639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling the value for money of changing clinical practice change: a stochastic application in diabetes care.
    Hoomans T; Abrams KR; Ament AJ; Evers SM; Severens JL
    Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19648827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making.
    Hyde KM; Maier HR; Colby CB
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Dec; 77(4):278-90. PubMed ID: 16288957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system.
    Rehana S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3653-64. PubMed ID: 19674829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain.
    Carmona G; Varela-Ortega C; Bromley J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():400-12. PubMed ID: 23792817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust stochastic fuzzy possibilistic programming for environmental decision making under uncertainty.
    Zhang X; Huang GH; Nie X
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 19863998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An index-based robust decision making framework for watershed management in a changing climate.
    Kim Y; Chung ES
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():88-102. PubMed ID: 24365586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An inexact optimization approach for river water-quality management.
    Karmakar S; Mujumdar PP
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Nov; 81(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 16545902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of potential responses to invasive non-native species with structured decision making.
    Liu S; Walshe T; Long G; Cook D
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Jun; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 22519636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of patient level data: a review of the use of Bayesian methods to inform health technology assessments.
    McCarron CE; Pullenayegum EM; Marshall DA; Goeree R; Tarride JE
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 19845985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.