These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design. Yan D; Wages NA; Dressler EV J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):333-347. PubMed ID: 30451068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A Bayesian dose-finding design for outcomes evaluated with uncertainty. Schipper MJ; Yuan Y; Taylor JM; Ten Haken RK; Tsien C; Lawrence TS Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 18(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 33884907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Borrowing historical information to improve phase I clinical trials using meta-analytic-predictive priors. Chen X; Zhang J; Jiang Q; Yan F J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jan; 32(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 35594366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Interplay of priors and skeletons in two-stage continual reassessment method. Iasonos A; O'Quigley J Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4321-36. PubMed ID: 22893483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark. Wages NA; Conaway MR; O'Quigley J Clin Trials; 2013; 10(6):862-75. PubMed ID: 24085776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Phase I trial design for drug combinations with Bayesian model averaging. Jin IH; Huo L; Yin G; Yuan Y Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25641851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent. Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method. Ji L; Lewinger JP; Krailo M; Groshen S; Conti DV; Asgharzadeh S; Sposto R Pharm Stat; 2019 Nov; 18(6):659-670. PubMed ID: 31237419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method. Wheeler GM; Mander AP; Bedding A; Brock K; Cornelius V; Grieve AP; Jaki T; Love SB; Odondi L; Weir CJ; Yap C; Bond SJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30658575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dose finding with continuous outcome in phase I oncology trials. Wang Y; Ivanova A Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 25408518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials. Lin R; Yin G Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2. Guo W; Wang SJ; Yang S; Lynn H; Ji Y Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Jul; 58():23-33. PubMed ID: 28458054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Seamless Phase I/II Adaptive Design for Oncology Trials of Molecularly Targeted Agents. Wages NA; Tait C J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):903-20. PubMed ID: 24904956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method. Bayar MA; Ivanova A; Le Teuff G Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():211-223. PubMed ID: 31200907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Multi-stage dose expansion cohort (MSDEC) design with Bayesian stopping rule. Wang S; Tan M J Biopharm Stat; 2022 Jul; 32(4):600-612. PubMed ID: 35699319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Phase I trial of bortezomib and concurrent external beam radiation in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Pugh TJ; Chen C; Rabinovitch R; Eckhardt SG; Rusthoven KE; Swing R; Raben D Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Oct; 78(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 20133082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A Bayesian three-parameter logistic model for early- and late-onset DLTs in oncology Phase I studies. Zheng W; Zhao Y; Lu Y; Miao H; Liu H J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(2):339-51. PubMed ID: 25629564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A simulation-free approach to assessing the performance of the continual reassessment method. Braun TM Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4651-4666. PubMed ID: 32939800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of irrational dose assignment definitions using the continual reassessment method. Wages NA; Bagley E Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):665-672. PubMed ID: 31547691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]