These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21413095)

  • 1. Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms.
    Hetényi C; van der Spoel D
    Protein Sci; 2011 May; 20(5):880-93. PubMed ID: 21413095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors.
    Chikhi R; Sael L; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2010 Jul; 78(9):2007-28. PubMed ID: 20455259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
    Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3784-9. PubMed ID: 22355140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites.
    Laurie AT; Jackson RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15701681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comprehensive identification of "druggable" protein ligand binding sites.
    An J; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 15706489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-organizing fuzzy graphs for structure-based comparison of protein pockets.
    Reisen F; Weisel M; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Dec; 9(12):6498-510. PubMed ID: 20883038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shape complementarity of protein-protein complexes at multiple resolutions.
    Zhang Q; Sanner M; Olson AJ
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):453-67. PubMed ID: 18837463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MetaPocket: a meta approach to improve protein ligand binding site prediction.
    Huang B
    OMICS; 2009 Aug; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 19645590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.
    Liang J; Edelsbrunner H; Woodward C
    Protein Sci; 1998 Sep; 7(9):1884-97. PubMed ID: 9761470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scoring optimisation of unbound protein-protein docking including protein binding site predictions.
    Schneider S; Zacharias M
    J Mol Recognit; 2012 Jan; 25(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 22213447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Large-scale comparison of four binding site detection algorithms.
    Schmidtke P; Souaille C; Estienne F; Baurin N; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2191-200. PubMed ID: 20828173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting protein-ligand binding site using support vector machine with protein properties.
    Wong GY; Leung FH; Ling SH
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(6):1517-29. PubMed ID: 24407309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Augmented Pocketome: Detection and Analysis of Small-Molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins of Known 3D Structure.
    Bhagavat R; Sankar S; Srinivasan N; Chandra N
    Structure; 2018 Mar; 26(3):499-512.e2. PubMed ID: 29514079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.
    Shin WH; Bures MG; Kihara D
    Methods; 2016 Jan; 93():41-50. PubMed ID: 26427548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets.
    Gao M; Skolnick J
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 23335017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. fPOP: footprinting functional pockets of proteins by comparative spatial patterns.
    Tseng YY; Chen ZJ; Li WH
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jan; 38(Database issue):D288-95. PubMed ID: 19880384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.