These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2141328)

  • 1. Acoustic prism causing sonographic duplication artifact in the upper abdomen.
    Vandeman FN; Meilstrup JW; Nealey PA
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jun; 25(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 2141328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound image properties influenced by abdominal wall thickness and composition.
    Haberkorn U; Layer G; Rudat V; Zuna I; Lorenz A; van Kaick G
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1993 Sep; 21(7):423-9. PubMed ID: 8370802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic refraction by the rectus abdominis muscles: the double image artifact.
    Müller N; Cooperberg PL; Rowley VA; Mayo J; Ho B; Li DK
    J Ultrasound Med; 1984 Nov; 3(11):515-9. PubMed ID: 6239930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double aorta artifact in sonography - a diagnostic challenge.
    Hadzik R; Bombiński P; Brzewski M
    J Ultrason; 2017 Mar; 17(68):36-40. PubMed ID: 28439427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The split image artifact in pelvic ultrasonography: the anatomy and physics.
    Sauerbrei EE
    J Ultrasound Med; 1985 Jan; 4(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3156252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The double aorta--rarity or artifact of ultrasound].
    Heyne JP
    Ultraschall Med; 2000 Jun; 21(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 10929603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hypoechoic fat: a sonographic pitfall.
    Spencer GM; Rubens DJ; Roach DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1277-80. PubMed ID: 7717247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The interparietal hepatic fat pad--a source of error in the diagnosis of a hematoma of the musculus rectus abdominis].
    Eisenscher A
    Ultraschall Med; 1985 Apr; 6(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 3160105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new anatomical and surgical landmark in internal abdominal oblique muscle: fat triangle.
    Madaen K; Niknafs B
    Urol J; 2012; 9(1):420-2. PubMed ID: 22395841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The anterior abdominal fat body.
    Merklin RJ
    Am J Anat; 1971 Sep; 132(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 4255265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part I: The visceroperitoneal bordeline, anatomy and the method of examination.
    Smereczyński A; Starzyńska T; Kołaczyk K; Bojko S; Gałdyńska M; Bernatowicz E; Walecka A
    J Ultrason; 2012 Dec; 12(51):472-8. PubMed ID: 26674107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part I. Measurements.
    Hinkelman LM; Mast TD; Metlay LA; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3635-49. PubMed ID: 9857521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of alignment error due to a speed artifact in stereotactic ultrasound image guidance.
    Salter BJ; Wang B; Szegedi MW; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Shrieve DC; Cheng R; Fuss M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):N437-45. PubMed ID: 19001694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study.
    Tornaghi G; Raiteri R; Pozzato C; Rispoli A; Bramani M; Cipolat M; Craveri A
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Nov; 18(11):771-5. PubMed ID: 7866479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sampling bandwidth and fat suppression: effects on long TR/TE MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T.
    Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Rifkin MD; Burk DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):419-25. PubMed ID: 2750630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An unusual transversus abdominis plane block: anatomic variation in the internal oblique muscle.
    Lew VK; Gray AT
    Anesthesiology; 2013 Nov; 119(5):1209. PubMed ID: 23237977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of abdominal wall morphology on ultrasonic pulse distortion. Part II. Simulations.
    Mast TD; Hinkelman LM; Orr MJ; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3651-64. PubMed ID: 9857522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonography of the anterior abdominal wall.
    Engel JM; Deitch EE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Jul; 137(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6454338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal wall fat index, estimated by ultrasonography, for assessment of the ratio of visceral fat to subcutaneous fat in the abdomen.
    Suzuki R; Watanabe S; Hirai Y; Akiyama K; Nishide T; Matsushima Y; Murayama H; Ohshima H; Shinomiya M; Shirai K
    Am J Med; 1993 Sep; 95(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 8368228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of mesenteric fat to unsatisfactory abdominal and pelvic ultrasonography.
    Bree RL; Schwab RE
    Radiology; 1981 Sep; 140(3):773-6. PubMed ID: 7280248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.