These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2141338)

  • 1. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 69(6):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2141338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations with and without light-cured glass-ionomer (poly alkenoate) cement lining.
    Shortall AC
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1291025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8329161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in Class I restorations.
    Miguez PA; Pereira PN; Foxton RM; Walter R; Nunes MF; Swift EJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):839-45. PubMed ID: 15451239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques.
    Martin FE; O'Rourke M
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Apr; 38(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 8494504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1988 May; 67(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 2966820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations.
    Davidson CL; Abdalla AI
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 8054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of lining techniques on the marginal seal of Class II composite resin restorations.
    Blixt M; Coli P
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 8511279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Leakage pathway of Class V cavities restored with different flowable resin composite restorations.
    Awliya WY; El-Sahn AM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18335730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent evaluation of composite internal adaptation and bond strength in a class-I cavity.
    Bakhsh TA; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Mandurah MM; Hariri I; Alsayed EZ; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 23044389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.