These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2141355)

  • 1. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2141355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.
    Grainger J; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 2304817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.
    Perea M; Carreiras M; Grainger J
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Oct; 32(7):1090-102. PubMed ID: 15813492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and implicit memory in the category-verification and lexical decision tasks.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):662-79. PubMed ID: 18444763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adult age differences in letter-level and word-level processing.
    Allen PA; Madden DJ; Crozier LC
    Psychol Aging; 1991 Jun; 6(2):261-71. PubMed ID: 1863395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition, semantic priming, and stimulus quality: implications for the interactive-compensatory reading model.
    Durgunoglu AY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 2972798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exterior letters are not privileged in the early stage of visual word recognition during reading: comment on Jordan, Thomas, Patching and Scott-Brown (2003).
    Inhoff AW; Radach R; Eiter BM; Skelly M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):894-9. PubMed ID: 14516222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming.
    Lacruz I; Folk J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1261-84. PubMed ID: 15513246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition.
    Connine CM; Mullennix J; Shernoff E; Yelen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1084-96. PubMed ID: 2148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.
    Siakaluk PD; Pexman PM; Aguilera L; Owen WJ; Sears CR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):433-43. PubMed ID: 17258186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Verification of nonwords: The baseword frequency effect in children's pseudohomophone reading.
    Tiffin-Richards SP; Schroeder S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2289-2294. PubMed ID: 29330681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition.
    Drews E; Zwitserlood P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Oct; 21(5):1098-116. PubMed ID: 7595245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.