These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21414744)

  • 21. Augmentation of acrylic bone cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes.
    Marrs B; Andrews R; Rantell T; Pienkowski D
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 16392130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical bond strength of the cement-tibial component interface in total knee arthroplasty.
    Pittman GT; Peters CL; Hines JL; Bachus KN
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):883-8. PubMed ID: 16950044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [In vitro studies on various PMMA bone cements: a first comparison of new materials for arthroplasty].
    Kock HJ; Huber FX; Hillmeier J; Jäger R; Volkmann R; Handschin AE; Letsch R; Meeder PJ
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 18324591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
    Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modified PMMA cements for a hydrolysis resistant metal-polymer interface in orthopaedic applications.
    Gbureck U; Grübel S; Thull R; Barralet JE
    Acta Biomater; 2005 Nov; 1(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 16701848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty].
    Wirtz DC; Lelgemann B; Jungwirth F; Niethard FU; Marx R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12695959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microtomography assessment of failure in acrylic bone cement.
    Sinnett-Jones PE; Browne M; Ludwig W; Buffière JY; Sinclair I
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6460-6. PubMed ID: 15967499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of bleeding on the cement-bone interface. An experimental study.
    Majkowski RS; Bannister GC; Miles AW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Feb; (299):293-7. PubMed ID: 8119032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system.
    Algera TJ; Feilzer AJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Kleverlaan CJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):608-12. PubMed ID: 21131391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cement viscosity affects the bone-cement interface in total hip arthroplasty.
    Stone JJ; Rand JA; Chiu EK; Grabowski JJ; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):834-7. PubMed ID: 8893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tensile bond strength of dual curing resin-based cements to commercially pure titanium.
    Schneider R; de Goes MF; Henriques GE; Chan DC
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 16442156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pull-out strength of a polished tapered stem is improved by placing bone cement over the shoulder of the implant.
    Subramanian KN; Temple AJ; Evans S; John A
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 18823741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.