243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21415634)
1. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant treatment planning regarding augmentation procedures: panoramic radiographs vs. cone beam computed tomography images.
Dagassan-Berndt DC; Zitzmann NU; Walter C; Schulze RK
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):1010-6. PubMed ID: 26227397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT.
Garcia Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Gründler K; Visser H; Hirsch E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 18602314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
Felix RP; Shinkai RSA; Rockenbach MIB
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
Scarfe WC; Li Z; Aboelmaaty W; Scott SA; Farman AG
Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():46-60. PubMed ID: 22376097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of mesiodistal tooth angulations determined through traditional panoramic radiographs and cone beam CT panoramic images].
Lei Q; Zhou L; Lei L; Wang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):331-5. PubMed ID: 25241531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants.
Schulze RK; Berndt D; d'Hoedt B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 19845706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation between panoramic radiography and reconstructed panoramic images from cone beam computed tomography].
Liu S; Wen F; Chen H; Liu Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 49(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24697881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shading correction algorithm for improvement of cone-beam CT images in radiotherapy.
Marchant TE; Moore CJ; Rowbottom CG; MacKay RI; Williams PC
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(20):5719-33. PubMed ID: 18824785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
Ballrick JW; Palomo JM; Ruch E; Amberman BD; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calcification of the stylohyoid ligament in panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography among patients referred for dental implant treatment planning.
Mahdian M; Moghaddam EJ; Alzahrani A; Rengasamy K; Tadinada A
Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 25033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography.
Madrigal C; Ortega R; Meniz C; López-Quiles J
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 May; 13(5):E307-12. PubMed ID: 18449115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement accuracy and reliability of tooth length on conventional and CBCT reconstructed panoramic radiographs.
Flores-Mir C; Rosenblatt MR; Major PW; Carey JP; Heo G
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(5):45-53. PubMed ID: 25715716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mesiodistal root angulation using panoramic and cone beam CT.
Peck JL; Sameshima GT; Miller A; Worth P; Hatcher DC
Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 17319753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
