148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21415794)
1. Biomechanical effect of the C2 laminar decortication on the stability of C2 intralaminar screw construct and biomechanical comparison of C2 intralaminar screw and C2 pars screw.
Hong JT; Takigawa T; Udayakunmar R; Shin HK; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Inoue N; An HS
Neurosurgery; 2011 Sep; 69(1 Suppl Operative):ons1-6; discussion ons6-7. PubMed ID: 21415794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.
Lapsiwala SB; Anderson PA; Oza A; Resnick DK
Neurosurgery; 2006 Mar; 58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. PubMed ID: 16528192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical analysis of the C2 intralaminar fixation technique using a cross-link and offset connector for an unstable atlantoaxial joint.
Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Wilson KW
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22405616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
Takigawa T; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Hong JT; Ito Y; Inoue N; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis comparing three C1-C2 transarticular screw salvaging fixation techniques.
Elgafy H; Potluri T; Goel VK; Foster S; Faizan A; Kulkarni N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 20081561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of biomechanical stability and pullout strength of two C1-C2 fixation constructs.
Savage JW; Limthongkul W; Park HS; Zhang LQ; Karaikovic EE
Spine J; 2011 Jul; 11(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 21640660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical analysis of screw constructs for atlantoaxial fixation in cadavers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Du JY; Aichmair A; Kueper J; Wright T; Lebl DR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 25478824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atlantoaxial fixation using C1 posterior arch screws: feasibility study, morphometric data, and biomechanical analysis.
Cadena G; Duong HT; Liu JJ; Kim KD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 30(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 30554179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of fatigue strength of C2 pedicle screws, C2 pars screws, and a hybrid construct in C1-C2 fixation.
Su BW; Shimer AL; Chinthakunta S; Salloum K; Ames CP; Vaccaro AR; Bucklen B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jan; 39(1):E12-9. PubMed ID: 24108297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1-2 transarticular screw-graft fixation.
Härtl R; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; Chou D; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Oct; 5(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 17048771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation.
Gorek J; Acaroglu E; Berven S; Yousef A; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(13):1513-8. PubMed ID: 15990665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute and long-term stability of atlantoaxial fixation methods: a biomechanical comparison of pars, pedicle, and intralaminar fixation in an intact and odontoid fracture model.
Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson MD; Sasso RC; Kuhns C; Riew DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 19214095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical investigation of a novel integrated device for intra-articular stabilization of the C1-C2 (atlantoaxial) joint.
Robertson PA; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 22341395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques.
Claybrooks R; Kayanja M; Milks R; Benzel E
Spine J; 2007; 7(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 17434809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.
Uribe JS; Ramos E; Youssef AS; Levine N; Turner AW; Johnson WM; Vale FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):931-8. PubMed ID: 20375778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus intralaminar C2 fixation in C2-C6 subaxial constructs.
Benke MT; O'Brien JR; Turner AW; Yu WD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):E33-7. PubMed ID: 21192213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques.
Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Hokari Y; Neale PG; Zhao C; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jun; 32(13):E363-70. PubMed ID: 17545899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
