148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21415794)
21. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A biomechanical analysis of C2 corpectomy constructs.
Puttlitz CM; Harms J; Xu Z; Deviren V; Melcher RP
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 17321971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of an atlantoaxial lateral mass fusion cage with C1-C2 pedicle fixation.
Li S; Ni B; Xie N; Wang M; Guo X; Zhang F; Wang J; Zhao W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):E624-32. PubMed ID: 20505567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of contemporary occipitocervical instrumentation techniques with and without C1 lateral mass screws.
Wolfla CE; Salerno SA; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA
Neurosurgery; 2007 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):87-93; discussion 93. PubMed ID: 17876237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical evaluation of segmental occipitoatlantoaxial stabilization techniques.
Nassos JT; Ghanayem AJ; Sasso RC; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Rinella AS; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2740-4. PubMed ID: 19940731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion.
Park J; Scheer JK; Lim TJ; Deviren V; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 21332283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of a novel C1 posterior locking plate with the harms technique in a C1-C2 fixation model.
Kelly BP; Glaser JA; DiAngelo DJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):E920-5. PubMed ID: 19011532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. C1 lateral mass fixation: a comparison of constructs.
Mummaneni PV; Lu DC; Dhall SS; Mummaneni VP; Chou D
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl):153-60. PubMed ID: 20173519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A biomechanical comparison of crossed and parallel rod configurations in atlantoaxial internal fixation.
Qiu F; Zou XB; Xu XL; Jiang WC; Liu GC; Ma XY
Eur Spine J; 2021 Feb; 30(2):576-584. PubMed ID: 33180193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Integrated C1 Laminar Hook Combined with C1-C2 Transarticular Screws for Atlantoaxial Fusion: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Study.
Xu T; Guo Q; Liu Q; Zhang P; Lu M; Lu X; Chen F; Guo X; Ni B
World Neurosurg; 2016 Aug; 92():133-139. PubMed ID: 27185648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical stability with lateral mass plating: unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase.
Muffoletto AJ; Yang J; Vadhva M; Hadjipavlou AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):778-81. PubMed ID: 12698120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel technique for surgical repair of spondylolysis in adolescents.
Ulibarri JA; Anderson PA; Escarcega T; Mann D; Noonan KJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Aug; 31(18):2067-72. PubMed ID: 16915090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Augmentation of occipitocervical contoured rod fixation with C1-C2 transarticular screws.
Yüksel KZ; Crawford NR; Melton MS; Dickman CA
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 17321967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative biomechanical study of a novel integrated plate spacer for stabilization of cervical spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Majid K; Chinthakunta S; Muzumdar A; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):532-6. PubMed ID: 22244511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
Miyanji F; Mahar A; Oka R; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2-3 instrumentation.
Reddy C; Ingalhalikar AV; Channon S; Lim TH; Torner J; Hitchon PW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct; 7(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 17933316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical pullout strength and stability of the cervical artificial pedicle screw.
Barnes AH; Eguizabal JA; Acosta FL; Lotz JC; Buckley JM; Ames CP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E16-20. PubMed ID: 19127143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.
Papagelopoulos PJ; Currier BL; Neale PG; Hokari Y; Berglund LJ; Larson DR; Fisher DR; An KN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):13-24. PubMed ID: 12782855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.
Melcher RP; Puttlitz CM; Kleinstueck FS; Lotz JC; Harms J; Bradford DS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2435-40. PubMed ID: 12435971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Lateral mass versus hybrid construct for cervical laminectomy and fusion.
Regan CM; Emmanuel S; Hornik C; Weinhold P; Lim MR
Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e484-8. PubMed ID: 23590790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
