146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21416317)
1. Digital magnification mammography with matched incident exposure: physical imaging properties and detectability of simulated microcalcifications.
Tanaka N; Naka K; Fukushima H; Morishita J; Toyofuku F; Ohki M; Higashida Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jul; 4(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 21416317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New CR system with pixel size of 50 microm for digital mammography: physical imaging properties and detection of subtle microcalcifications.
Ideguchi T; Higashida Y; Kawaji Y; Sasaki M; Zaizen M; Shibayama R; Nakamura Y; Koyanagi K; Ikeda H; Ohki M; Toyofuku F; Muranaka T
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):218-24. PubMed ID: 15468941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications.
Sickles EA
Radiology; 1980 Oct; 137(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 7422866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications.
Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Funke M; Grabbe EH
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2188-91. PubMed ID: 12195468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].
Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2000 Jul; 172(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 10962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DIMA enlargement mammography in microcalcifications: a prospective study with ROC analysis.
Grunert JH; Barbey M; Berndt G; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E; Ratmann R; Rautmann B
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 11218029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
Grunert JH; Borchert B; Farber A; Gmelin E
Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Pascoal A; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 83(991):569-77. PubMed ID: 20603409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
