These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21416456)

  • 1. The temporal dynamics of effect anticipation in course of action planning.
    Ziessler M; Nattkemper D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1305-26. PubMed ID: 21416456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anticipated action consequences as a nexus between action and perception: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Nikolaev AR; Ziessler M; Dimova K; van Leeuwen C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Apr; 78(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 18289769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection.
    Daar M; Pratt J
    Cortex; 2008 Apr; 44(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 18387571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intention and attention in ideomotor learning.
    Herwig A; Waszak F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 18932052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing.
    Rieger M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Oct; 126(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 17250793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Congruency reversals in an accessory signal Simon task with auditory and visual stimuli.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P; Henderickx D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20451168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of inverting natural stimuli in a flanker task.
    Wells IC; Hamm JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19271814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulating response set in a choice reaction task: evidence for anatomical coding in response selection.
    Adam JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 17923098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The limits of attention for visual perception and action in aging.
    Lee TY; Hsieh S
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2009 May; 16(3):311-29. PubMed ID: 19301162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sensory nature of knowledge: Sensory priming effects in semantic categorization.
    Brunel L; Lesourd M; Labeye E; Versace R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):955-64. PubMed ID: 19787552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERPs predict the appearance of visual stimuli in a temporal selection task.
    Niedeggen M; Hesselmann G; Sahraie A; Milders M
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):205-15. PubMed ID: 16730675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simon congruency effects based on stimulus and response numerosity.
    Miller J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16618641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Crossmodal interaction in speeded responses: time window of integration model.
    Diederich A; Colonius H
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():119-35. PubMed ID: 19477335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equivalency of reaction times for simple and primed tasks.
    Hart MA; Reeve TG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 17055991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of attention and arousal on early responses in striate cortex.
    Poghosyan V; Shibata T; Ioannides AA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jul; 22(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 16029212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.