These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21416662)

  • 1. Using atmospheric tracers to reduce uncertainty in groundwater recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC; Robbins GA
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):858-68. PubMed ID: 21416662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpretation of environmental tracers in groundwater systems with stagnant water zones.
    Maloszewski P; Stichler W; Zuber A
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2004 Mar; 40(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 15085981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Programs for calibration-based Monte Carlo simulation of recharge areas.
    Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):472-6. PubMed ID: 21967487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model-averaging method for assessing groundwater conceptual model uncertainty.
    Ye M; Pohlmann KF; Chapman JB; Pohll GM; Reeves DM
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(5):716-28. PubMed ID: 19788638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PRO-GRADE: GIS toolkits for ground water recharge and discharge estimation.
    Lin YF; Wang J; Valocchi AJ
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 18823400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model uncertainty--parameter uncertainty versus conceptual models.
    Højberg AL; Refsgaard JC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 16304950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models.
    Leone A; Ripa MN; Uricchio V; Deák J; Vargay Z
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 18054423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking chloride mass balance infiltration rates with chlorofluorocarbon and SF6 groundwater dating in semi-arid settings: potential and limitations.
    Stadler S; Osenbruck K; Duijnisveld WH; Schwiede M; Bottcher J
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2010 Sep; 46(3):312-24. PubMed ID: 20812119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using 14C and 3H to delineate a recharge 'window' into the Perth Basin aquifers, North Gnangara groundwater system, Western Australia.
    Meredith K; Cendón DI; Pigois JP; Hollins S; Jacobsen G
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():456-69. PubMed ID: 22104381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification.
    Sivaganesan M; Haugland RA; Chern EC; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4726-35. PubMed ID: 20701947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of groundwater recharge on the North China Plain.
    Tan XC; Wu JW; Cai SY; Yang JZ
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(5):798-807. PubMed ID: 24032445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty estimation of pathlines in ground water models.
    Stauffer F
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 16324006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a fuzzy-stochastic nonlinear model to incorporate aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.
    Li H; Zhang K
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Jan; 111(1-4):1-12. PubMed ID: 19945767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated approach for addressing uncertainty in the delineation of groundwater management areas.
    Sousa MR; Frind EO; Rudolph DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 May; 148():12-24. PubMed ID: 23507137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ground water recharge and flow characterization using multiple isotopes.
    Chowdhury AH; Uliana M; Wade S
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 18384592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on the use of the RORA program for recharge estimation.
    Rutledge AT
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 17470127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Demonstrating trend reversal of groundwater quality in relation to time of recharge determined by 3H/3He.
    Visser A; Broers HP; van der Grift B; Bierkens MF
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Aug; 148(3):797-807. PubMed ID: 17383782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecohydrologic process modeling of mountain block groundwater recharge.
    Magruder IA; Woessner WW; Running SW
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):774-85. PubMed ID: 19702780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using MODFLOW 2000 to model ET and recharge for shallow ground water problems.
    Doble RC; Simmons CT; Walker GR
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 18624693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.