These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21416795)

  • 1. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research.
    Chavalarias D; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1205-15. PubMed ID: 20400265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.
    Reeves BC; van Binsbergen J; van Weel C
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2005 Aug; 59 Suppl 1():S155-61. PubMed ID: 16052184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 115(2):c94-9. PubMed ID: 20407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
    Podsakoff PM; MacKenzie SB; Lee JY; Podsakoff NP
    J Appl Psychol; 2003 Oct; 88(5):879-903. PubMed ID: 14516251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tutorials in clinical research: part IV: recognizing and controlling bias.
    Hartman JM; Forsen JW; Wallace MS; Neely JG
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jan; 112(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 11802034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Biases in meta-analysis].
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Sillero-Arenas M
    Med Clin (Barc); 1999; 112 Suppl 1():43-50. PubMed ID: 10618799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editorial bias in scientific publications.
    Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
    Neurologia; 2011; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21216501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.
    Oort FJ; Visser MR; Sprangers MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1126-37. PubMed ID: 19540722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oral contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism: a consideration of the impact of bias and confounding factors on epidemiological studies.
    Rekers H; Norpoth T; Michaels MA
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1996; 1(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 9678134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confounding bias and effect modification in epidemiologic research.
    Ely JW
    Fam Med; 1992; 24(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 1577216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Just Another Statistic".
    Machtay M; Glatstein E
    Oncologist; 1998; 3(3):III-IV. PubMed ID: 10388105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.