These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21417131)

  • 1. Timing of myofunctional appliance therapy.
    Singh S; Singh M; Saini A; Misra V; Sharma VP; Singh GK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 21417131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 10935956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non surgical treatment of a Class II malocclusion with skeletal hyperdivergency and anterior open bite.
    Rodriguez Flores JM
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2009; 20(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 19438108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of skeletal class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular deficiency using myofunctional appliances in growing individuals.
    Pachori Y; Navlani M; Gaur T; Bhatnagar S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 22565519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular growth and dentoalveolar development in the treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusion using Balters Bionator according to the skeletal maturation.
    dos Santos-Pinto PR; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A; Gandini Júnior LG; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto CC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):43-52. PubMed ID: 24262416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups.
    Cha KS
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ; Faltin RM; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Ghiozzi B; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of vertical control in the treatment of class II malocclusion with a combined maxillary splint.
    Garbui IU; Nouer PR; Nouer DF; Magnani MB; Pereira Neto JS
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 20339711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial changes in Class III malocclusion as related to skeletal and dental maturation.
    Baccetti T; Reyes BC; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):171.e1-171.e12. PubMed ID: 17693366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood.
    Baccetti T; Stahl F; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 19201320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected?
    Gkantidis N; Halazonetis DJ; Alexandropoulos E; Haralabakis NB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 21889079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.