379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21417512)
1. Working memory capacity and categorization: individual differences and modeling.
Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):720-38. PubMed ID: 21417512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Working memory does not dissociate between different perceptual categorization tasks.
Lewandowsky S; Yang LX; Newell BR; Kalish ML
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):881-904. PubMed ID: 22746954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whichever way you choose to categorize, working memory helps you learn.
Craig S; Lewandowsky S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 22022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Working memory supports inference learning just like classification learning.
Craig S; Lewandowsky S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1493-503. PubMed ID: 23931655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attention and working memory capacity: insights from blocking, highlighting, and knowledge restructuring.
Sewell DK; Lewandowsky S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Aug; 141(3):444-69. PubMed ID: 22201415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of working memory capacity in multiple-cue probability learning.
Rolison JJ; Evans JS; Walsh CR; Dennis I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1494-514. PubMed ID: 21722064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A note on DeCaro, Thomas, and Beilock (2008): further data demonstrate complexities in the assessment of information-integration category learning.
Tharp IJ; Pickering AD
Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):411-5. PubMed ID: 19027104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting.
Aslan A; Bäuml KH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):264-9. PubMed ID: 21090906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences.
Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Chee AE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):170-89. PubMed ID: 20053053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The contributions of attention and working memory to age differences in concept identification.
Hartman M; Nielsen C; Stratton B
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):227-45. PubMed ID: 15202542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lapsed attention to elapsed time? Individual differences in working memory capacity and temporal reproduction.
Broadway JM; Engle RW
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21470583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binding and inhibition in working memory: individual and age differences in short-term recognition.
Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 16131269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
Unsworth N
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive and psychomotor effects of risperidone in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.
Houthoofd SA; Morrens M; Sabbe BG
Clin Ther; 2008 Sep; 30(9):1565-89. PubMed ID: 18840365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: an individual differences analysis of immediate free recall.
Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):240-7. PubMed ID: 20053060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Working memory and mathematical cognitive development: limitations of limited-capacity resource models.
Berch DB
Dev Neuropsychol; 2008; 33(3):427-46. PubMed ID: 18473207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Arousal, working memory, and conscious awareness in contingency learning.
Cosand LD; Cavanagh TM; Brown AA; Courtney CG; Rissling AJ; Schell AM; Dawson ME
Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 18573667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What's so special about working memory? An examination of the relationships among working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence.
Mogle JA; Lovett BJ; Stawski RS; Sliwinski MJ
Psychol Sci; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1071-7. PubMed ID: 19076475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]