BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21417699)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Post-operative infection after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): literature review and cost analysis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Witham TF; Aaronson OS; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 54(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 21506066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.
    Terman SW; Yee TJ; Lau D; Khan AA; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun; 20(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 24745355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of perioperative costs and outcomes in patients with and without workers' compensation claims treated with minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Pelton MA; Phillips FM; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22):1914-9. PubMed ID: 22487713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost analysis of anterior-posterior circumferential fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Andres TM; Park JJ; Ricart Hoffiz PA; McHugh BJ; Warren DT; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 23353002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.
    Virdee JS; Nadig A; Anagnostopoulos G; George KJ
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 31(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 27331649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-utility of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Phan K; Hogan JA; Mobbs RJ
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Nov; 24(11):2503-13. PubMed ID: 26195079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
    Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) for Spondylolisthesis in 282 Patients: In Situ Arthrodesis versus Reduction.
    Scheer JK; Auffinger B; Wong RH; Lam SK; Lawton CD; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Fessler RG
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 84(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 25753232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature.
    Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; McGirt MJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jun; 24(6):916-21. PubMed ID: 26895529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.