180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21417763)
1. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing Arm Volume in People During and After Treatment for Breast Cancer: Reliability and Convergent Validity of the LymphaTech System.
Binkley JM; Weiler MJ; Frank N; Bober L; Dixon JB; Stratford PW
Phys Ther; 2020 Mar; 100(3):457-467. PubMed ID: 32043125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of lower limb volume: agreement between the vertically oriented perometer and a tape measure method.
Tan CW; Coutts F; Bulley C
Physiotherapy; 2013 Sep; 99(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 23351956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-rater reliability of arm circumference measurement.
Foroughi N; Dylke ES; Paterson RD; Sparrow KA; Fan J; Warwick EB; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011; 9(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 21688979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Communicating vessels volumeter to measure upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer: reliability and criterion validity compared to the gold standard.
de Carvalho RM; Miranda F
Braz J Phys Ther; 2019; 23(6):532-540. PubMed ID: 30448062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the best method to determine excessive arm volume in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema in clinical practice? Reliability, time efficiency and clinical feasibility of five different methods.
De Vrieze T; Gebruers N; Tjalma WA; Nevelsteen I; Thomis S; De Groef A; Dams L; Van der Gucht E; Belgrado JP; Vandermeeren L; Devoogdt N
Clin Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1221-1232. PubMed ID: 30880473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability and validity of the figure-of-eight method of measuring hand size in patients with breast cancer-related lymphoedema.
Borthwick Y; Paul L; Sneddon M; McAlpine L; Miller C
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2013 Mar; 22(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 23320995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability study of measurements for lymphedema in breast cancer patients.
Chen YW; Tsai HJ; Hung HC; Tsauo JY
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Jan; 87(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 17993983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Measurement Error of Breast Volume Calculation Using Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.
Fearn N; Meybodi F; Kilbreath S; Dylke E; Llanos C; Swanton C; Stuart K
Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Jun; 21(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 36154463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement Between Optoelectronic Volumetry and Circumferential Girth Measurements to Diagnose Lymphedema in Patients Submitted to Axillary Radical Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma.
Campanholi LL; Baiocchi JMT; Batista BN; Bergmann A; Fregnani JHTG; Duprat Neto JP
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):568-572. PubMed ID: 33555979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
