BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21418055)

  • 1. Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at risk for reading disability.
    Saine NL; Lerkkanen MK; Ahonen T; Tolvanen A; Lyytinen H
    Child Dev; 2011; 82(3):1013-28. PubMed ID: 21418055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving early language and literacy skills: differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention.
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ; Duff FJ; Fieldsend E; Carroll JM; Miles J; Götz K; Hulme C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 49(4):422-32. PubMed ID: 18081756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of bottom-up and top-down intervention principles in emergent literacy in children at risk of developmental dyslexia: a longitudinal study.
    Helland T; Tjus T; Hovden M; Ofte S; Heimann M
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 21383104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proofreading using an assistive software homophone tool: compensatory and remedial effects on the literacy skills of students with reading difficulties.
    Lange AA; Mulhern G; Wylie J
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(4):322-35. PubMed ID: 19264928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: a randomised controlled trial.
    Hatcher PJ; Hulme C; Miles JN; Carroll JM; Hatcher J; Gibbs S; Smith G; Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 47(8):820-7. PubMed ID: 16898996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remediation of developmental dyslexia: tackling a basic memory deficit.
    Kipp KH; Mohr G
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):38-55. PubMed ID: 18340603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties.
    Goodwin AP; Ahn S
    Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Dec; 60(2):183-208. PubMed ID: 20799003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonemes, rhymes, and intelligence as predictors of children's responsiveness to remedial reading instruction: evidence from a longitudinal intervention study.
    Hatcher PJ; Hulme C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 Feb; 72(2):130-53. PubMed ID: 9927526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory processing in developmental dyslexia: an exploratory study of an auditory and visual matching training program with Swedish children with developmental dyslexia.
    Törmänen MR; Takala M
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Jun; 50(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 19302414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why what we teach depends on when: grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size.
    Suggate SP
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 46(6):1556-79. PubMed ID: 20873927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer speech-based remediation for reading disabilities: the size of spelling-to-sound unit in a transparent orthography.
    Jiménez JE; Hernández-Valle I; Ramírez G; Ortiz Mdel R; Rodrigo M; Estévez A; O'Shanahan I; García E; Trabaue Mde L
    Span J Psychol; 2007 May; 10(1):52-67. PubMed ID: 17549878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Systematic application of visualized solution algorithms and verbal self-instruction in spelling remediation: initial results of general practice outcomes].
    Faber G
    Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2003 Nov; 52(9):677-88. PubMed ID: 14677488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of three interventions on the reading skills of children with reading disabilities in grade 2.
    Gustafson S; Fälth L; Svensson I; Tjus T; Heimann M
    J Learn Disabil; 2011; 44(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 21383105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluency remediation in dyslexic children: does age make a difference?
    Tressoldi PE; Lorusso ML; Brenbati F; Donini R
    Dyslexia; 2008 May; 14(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 17968977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading.
    Wise BW; Ring J; Olson RK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Nov; 77(3):197-235. PubMed ID: 11023657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dyslexia: advances in clinical and imaging studies.
    Koeda T; Seki A; Uchiyama H; Sadato N
    Brain Dev; 2011 Mar; 33(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 21146943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of computer-assisted practice on reading and spelling in children with learning disabilities].
    Jiménez JE; Muñetón MA
    Psicothema; 2010 Nov; 22(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 21044518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training reading fluency: is it important to practice reading aloud and is generalization possible?
    Hintikka S; Landerl K; Aro M; Lyytinen H
    Ann Dyslexia; 2008 Jun; 58(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 18483869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of children with reading difficulties.
    Hamilton SS; Glascoe FP
    Am Fam Physician; 2006 Dec; 74(12):2079-84. PubMed ID: 17186715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reorganizing the instructional reading components: could there be a better way to design remedial reading programs to maximize middle school students with reading disabilities' response to treatment?
    Calhoon MB; Sandow A; Hunter CV
    Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Jun; 60(1):57-85. PubMed ID: 20087694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.