These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21418315)
21. Systematic reviews addressing identified health policy priorities in Eastern Mediterranean countries: a situational analysis. El-Jardali F; Akl EA; Karroum LB; Kdouh O; Akik C; Fadlallah R; Hammoud R Health Res Policy Syst; 2014 Aug; 12():48. PubMed ID: 25139256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis. Moat KA; Lavis JN; Abelson J Milbank Q; 2013 Sep; 91(3):604-48. PubMed ID: 24028700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identifying additional studies for a systematic review of retention strategies in randomised controlled trials: making contact with trials units and trial methodologists. Brueton V; Tierney JF; Stenning S; Rait G Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 6(1):167. PubMed ID: 28830570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agencies. Pieper D; Antoine SL; Morfeld JC; Mathes T; Eikermann M Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):187-99. PubMed ID: 26052845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature. Czoski-Murray C; Lloyd Jones M; McCabe C; Claxton K; Oluboyede Y; Roberts J; Nicholl JP; Rees A; Reilly CS; Young D; Fleming T Health Technol Assess; 2012 Dec; 16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. PubMed ID: 23302507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: HOW EXTENSIVE ARE THEIR SEARCHES? Wood H; Arber M; Glanville JM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28343452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation. Williams I; McIver S; Moore D; Bryan S Health Technol Assess; 2008 Apr; 12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. PubMed ID: 18373906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of HTA reports on health policy: a systematic review. Gerhardus A; Dintsios CM GMS Health Technol Assess; 2005 Nov; 1():Doc02. PubMed ID: 21289923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems. Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, 2003-13: a multimethod evaluation. Guthrie S; Bienkowska-Gibbs T; Manville C; Pollitt A; Kirtley A; Wooding S Health Technol Assess; 2015 Aug; 19(67):1-291. PubMed ID: 26307643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Database combinations to retrieve systematic reviews in overviews of reviews: a methodological study. Goossen K; Hess S; Lunny C; Pieper D BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):138. PubMed ID: 32487023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review. Gates M; Gates A; Guitard S; Pollock M; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):254. PubMed ID: 33148319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Searching practices and inclusion of unpublished studies in systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy. Korevaar DA; Salameh JP; Vali Y; Cohen JF; McInnes MDF; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 31981399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Bero LA; Jadad AR Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9214251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A decision tool to help researchers make decisions about including systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions. Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Newton AS; Scott SD; Hartling L Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):29. PubMed ID: 30670086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers. Lawani MA; Valéra B; Fortier-Brochu É; Légaré F; Carmichael PH; Côté L; Voyer P; Kröger E; Witteman H; Rodriguez C; Giguere AM Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):56. PubMed ID: 28298241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter. Rees S; Williams A JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(13):492-582. PubMed ID: 27819974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them. Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]