These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21419068)

  • 1. Hearing aids in the real world: typical automatic behavior of expansion, directionality, and noise management.
    Banerjee S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 21419068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing aids in the real world: use of multimemory and volume controls.
    Banerjee S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jun; 22(6):359-74. PubMed ID: 21864473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Adaptive Hearing Aid Directionality and Noise Reduction on Masked Speech Recognition for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Browning JM; Buss E; Flaherty M; Vallier T; Leibold LJ
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 30938559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties.
    Davidson A; Marrone N; Souza P
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 35133851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferred real-ear insertion gain on a commercial hearing aid at different speech and noise levels.
    Kuk FK; Harper T; Doubek K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Mar; 5(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 8180434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
    Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain.
    Humes LE; Christensen LA; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 40(3):666-85. PubMed ID: 9210122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.