296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21419290)
1. Anesthetic efficacy of a combination palatal and buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar.
Guglielmo A; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):460-2. PubMed ID: 21419290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL versus 3.6 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar.
Martin M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 21496653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar.
McEntire M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 21419288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mikesell A; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18215665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for combination labial plus lingual infiltrations versus labial infiltration in the mandibular lateral incisor.
Nuzum FM; Drum M; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):952-6. PubMed ID: 20478446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block.
Forloine A; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1770-7. PubMed ID: 20951285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective, randomized single-blind study of the anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:50,000 epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve block.
Wali M; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J
J Endod; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1459-62. PubMed ID: 20728709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Buccal versus lingual articaine infiltration for mandibular tooth anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
Meechan JG; Jaber AA; Corbett IP; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2011 Jul; 44(7):676-81. PubMed ID: 21447137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and 3% mepivacaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Mason R; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19720211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular permanent first molar teeth: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltration injections in volunteers.
Meechan JG; Kanaa MD; Corbett IP; Steen IN; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):764-9. PubMed ID: 16948661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 milliliters and 3.6 milliliters of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks.
Pfeil L; Drum M; Reader A; Gilles J; Nusstein J
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):598-601. PubMed ID: 20307730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection following a primary intraosseous injection.
Jensen J; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 18215666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of the greater palatine and high tuberosity second division nerve blocks.
Broering R; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1337-42. PubMed ID: 19801226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of single buccal infiltrations for maxillary first molars in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Atasoy Ulusoy Öİ; Alaçam T
Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 23656209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The anesthetic efficacy of diphenhydramine and the combination diphenhydramine/lidocaine for the inferior alveolar nerve block.
Willett J; Reader A; Drum M; Nusstein J; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1446-50. PubMed ID: 19026871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Ansari I; Kohli S
J Endod; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1491-4. PubMed ID: 22000449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
