BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21419560)

  • 1. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Smekal D; Johansson J; Huzevka T; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2011 Jun; 82(6):702-6. PubMed ID: 21419560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS device--a pilot study.
    Smekal D; Johansson J; Huzevka T; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1104-7. PubMed ID: 19595496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system.
    Yost D; Phillips RH; Gonzales L; Lick CJ; Satterlee P; Levy M; Barger J; Dodson P; Poggi S; Wojcik K; Niskanen RA; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2012 Aug; 83(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 22310728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Rubertsson S; Karlsten R
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jun; 65(3):357-63. PubMed ID: 15919574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in cardiac arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation.
    Rubertsson S; Silfverstolpe J; Rehn L; Nyman T; Lichtveld R; Boomars R; Bruins W; Ahlstedt B; Puggioli H; Lindgren E; Smekal D; Skoog G; Kastberg R; Lindblad A; Halliwell D; Box M; Arnwald F; Hardig BM; Chamberlain D; Herlitz J; Karlsten R
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 21():5. PubMed ID: 23351178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Perkins GD; Lall R; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Cooke MW; Horton J; Lamb SE; Slowther AM; Woollard M; Carson A; Smyth M; Whitfield R; Williams A; Pocock H; Black JJ; Wright J; Han K; Gates S;
    Lancet; 2015 Mar; 385(9972):947-55. PubMed ID: 25467566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CPR-related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device: a multicentre study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation.
    Smekal D; Lindgren E; Sandler H; Johansson J; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2014 Dec; 85(12):1708-12. PubMed ID: 25277343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and after introduction of a mechanical chest compression device, LUCAS-2; a prospective, observational study.
    Tranberg T; Lassen JF; Kaltoft AK; Hansen TM; Stengaard C; Knudsen L; Trautner S; Terkelsen CJ
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Apr; 23():37. PubMed ID: 25898992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Timerman S; Cardoso LF; Ramires JA; Halperin H
    Resuscitation; 2004 Jun; 61(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15172705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) versus manual CPR according to pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO2) during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
    Axelsson C; Karlsson T; Axelsson AB; Herlitz J
    Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1099-103. PubMed ID: 19716640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.
    Gyory RA; Buchle SE; Rodgers D; Lubin JS
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28435494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new device producing manual sternal compression with thoracic constraint for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Niemann JT; Rosborough JP; Kassabian L; Salami B
    Resuscitation; 2006 May; 69(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 16457933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.
    Rubertsson S; Lindgren E; Smekal D; Östlund O; Silfverstolpe J; Lichtveld RA; Boomars R; Ahlstedt B; Skoog G; Kastberg R; Halliwell D; Box M; Herlitz J; Karlsten R
    JAMA; 2014 Jan; 311(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24240611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical chest compressions improved aspects of CPR in the LINC trial.
    Esibov A; Banville I; Chapman FW; Boomars R; Box M; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2015 Jun; 91():116-21. PubMed ID: 25766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Olasveengen TM; Wik L; Steen PA
    Resuscitation; 2008 Feb; 76(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 17728039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome among VF/VT patients in the LINC (LUCAS IN cardiac arrest) trial-A randomised, controlled trial.
    Hardig BM; Lindgren E; Östlund O; Herlitz J; Karlsten R; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2017 Jun; 115():155-162. PubMed ID: 28385642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CPREzy: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed.
    Perkins GD; Augré C; Rogers H; Allan M; Thickett DR
    Resuscitation; 2005 Jan; 64(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 15629562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.
    Aufderheide TP; Pirrallo RG; Yannopoulos D; Klein JP; von Briesen C; Sparks CW; Deja KA; Conrad CJ; Kitscha DJ; Provo TA; Lurie KG
    Resuscitation; 2005 Mar; 64(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 15733766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised trial and economic evaluation.
    Gates S; Lall R; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Cooke MW; Horton J; Lamb SE; Slowther AM; Woollard M; Carson A; Smyth M; Wilson K; Parcell G; Rosser A; Whitfield R; Williams A; Jones R; Pocock H; Brock N; Black JJ; Wright J; Han K; Shaw G; Blair L; Marti J; Hulme C; McCabe C; Nikolova S; Ferreira Z; Perkins GD
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Mar; 21(11):1-176. PubMed ID: 28393757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.