These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21419993)

  • 1. Sexual selection: do flies lie with asymmetric legs?
    Ritchie MG; Vahed K
    Curr Biol; 2011 Mar; 21(6):R233-4. PubMed ID: 21419993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual selection on multiple female ornaments in dance flies.
    Murray RL; Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1887):. PubMed ID: 30232158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on 'honest' female ornamentation.
    LeBas NR; Hockham LR; Ritchie MG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Oct; 270(1529):2159-65. PubMed ID: 14561280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stabilizing sexual selection for female ornaments in a dance fly.
    Wheeler J; Gwynne DT; Bussière LF
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jul; 25(7):1233-42. PubMed ID: 22551204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual selection on morphological and physiological traits and fluctuating asymmetry in the black scavenger fly Sepsis cynipsea.
    Blanckenhorn WU; Kraushaar UR; Teuschl Y; Reim C
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):629-41. PubMed ID: 15149405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bending for love: losses and gains of sexual dimorphisms are strictly correlated with changes in the mounting position of sepsid flies (Sepsidae: Diptera).
    Puniamoorthy N; Su KF; Meier R
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 May; 8():155. PubMed ID: 18492287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual selection accounts for the geographic reversal of sexual size dimorphism in the dung fly, sepsis punctum (Diptera: Sepsidae).
    Puniamoorthy N; Schäfer MA; Blanckenhorn WU
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2117-26. PubMed ID: 22759289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No detectable genetic correlation between male and female mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni.
    Grant CA; Chapman T; Pomiankowski A; Fowler K
    Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Dec; 95(6):444-8. PubMed ID: 16094297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae): modelling the evolution and development of an exaggerated sexual trait.
    Warren I; Smith H
    Bioessays; 2007 Mar; 29(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 17295307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrasting sexual selection on males and females in a role-reversed swarming dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Diptera: Empididae).
    Bussière LF; Gwynne DT; Brooks R
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1683-91. PubMed ID: 18643861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual selection in the gift-giving dance fly, Rhamphomyia sulcata, favors small males carrying small gifts.
    LeBas NR; Hockham LR; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1763-72. PubMed ID: 15446428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies.
    David P; Bjorksten T; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):186-8. PubMed ID: 10910358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection.
    Hosken DJ; House CM
    Curr Biol; 2011 Jan; 21(2):R62-5. PubMed ID: 21256434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary genetics: evolution of mate choice in the wild.
    Postma E; Griffith SC; Brooks R
    Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):E16; discussion E16-7. PubMed ID: 17167425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heightened condition dependence is not a general feature of male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae).
    Cotton S; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1310-6. PubMed ID: 15525415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection for size and symmetry in a diversifying secondary sexual character in Drosophila bipectinata Duda (Diptera: Drosophilidae).
    Polak M; Starmer WT; Wolf LL
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 15119443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sperm competition and ejaculate economics.
    Parker GA; Pizzari T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2010 Nov; 85(4):897-934. PubMed ID: 20560928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae).
    Bonduriansky R; Rowe L
    Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 15792234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.