BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21421429)

  • 1. Recognizing architectural distortion in mammogram: a multiscale texture modeling approach with GMM.
    Biswas SK; Mukherjee DP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 58(7):2023-30. PubMed ID: 21421429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Based on Texture Analysis Using Support Vector Machine Classifier with Clinical Evaluation.
    Kamra A; Jain VK; Singh S; Mittal S
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 26138756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
    Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided evaluation of screening mammograms based on local texture models.
    Grim J; Somol P; Haindl M; Danes J
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Apr; 18(4):765-73. PubMed ID: 19228558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On combining morphological component analysis and concentric morphology model for mammographic mass detection.
    Gao X; Wang Y; Li X; Tao D
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2010 Mar; 14(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19906595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical mode decomposition of digital mammograms for the statistical based characterization of architectural distortion.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():109-12. PubMed ID: 26736212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Texture classification by modeling joint distributions of local patterns with gaussian mixtures.
    Lategahn H; Gross S; Stehle T; Aach T
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Jun; 19(6):1548-57. PubMed ID: 20129862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
    Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
    Vikhe PS; Thool VR
    J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MRT letter: Quantum noise removal and classification of breast mammogram images.
    Naseem MT; Sulong GB; Jaffar MA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Dec; 75(12):1609-12. PubMed ID: 23034955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet filter and Markov random field model.
    Yu SN; Li KY; Huang YK
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006 Apr; 30(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 16723208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wavelet domain multifractal analysis for static and dynamic texture classification.
    Ji H; Yang X; Ling H; Xu Y
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jan; 22(1):286-99. PubMed ID: 22910109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated mammographic mass detection using deformable convolution and multiscale features.
    Peng J; Bao C; Hu C; Wang X; Jian W; Liu W
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2020 Jul; 58(7):1405-1417. PubMed ID: 32297129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
    Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of architectural distortion in prior mammograms via analysis of oriented patterns.
    Rangayyan RM; Banik S; Desautels JE
    J Vis Exp; 2013 Aug; (78):. PubMed ID: 24022326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dominant local binary patterns for texture classification.
    Liao S; Law MW; Chung AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 May; 18(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 19342342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental investigation on breast tissue classification based on statistical feature extraction of mammograms.
    Sheshadri HS; Kandaswamy A
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Jan; 31(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 17070012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new approach for the detection of architectural distortions using textural analysis of surrounding tissue.
    Zyout I; Togneri R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():3965-3968. PubMed ID: 28269153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.