392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21421718)
1. Searching for alternatives to full kinetic analysis in 18F-FDG PET: an extension of the simplified kinetic analysis method.
Hapdey S; Buvat I; Carson JM; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 21421718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simplified kinetic analysis of tumor 18F-FDG uptake: a dynamic approach.
Sundaram SK; Freedman NM; Carrasquillo JA; Carson JM; Whatley M; Libutti SK; Sellers D; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1328-33. PubMed ID: 15299057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of using abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input functions for accurate kinetic modeling of [
Sari H; Eriksson L; Mingels C; Alberts I; Casey ME; Afshar-Oromieh A; Conti M; Cumming P; Shi K; Rominger A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jan; 50(2):257-265. PubMed ID: 36192468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methodologic Considerations for Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT Studies of Hepatic Glucose Metabolism in Healthy Subjects.
Trägårdh M; Møller N; Sørensen M
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1366-71. PubMed ID: 26159590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.
Kurland BF; Muzi M; Peterson LM; Doot RK; Wangerin KA; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 57(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 26493206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shortened PET data acquisition protocol for the quantification of 18F-FDG kinetics.
Strauss LG; Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Haberkorn U
J Nucl Med; 2003 Dec; 44(12):1933-9. PubMed ID: 14660719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
Huet P; Burg S; Le Guludec D; Hyafil F; Buvat I
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 25722452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeatable noninvasive measurement of mouse myocardial glucose uptake with 18F-FDG: evaluation of tracer kinetics in a type 1 diabetes model.
Thorn SL; deKemp RA; Dumouchel T; Klein R; Renaud JM; Wells RG; Gollob MH; Beanlands RS; DaSilva JN
J Nucl Med; 2013 Sep; 54(9):1637-44. PubMed ID: 23940301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Liver kinetics of glucose analogs measured in pigs by PET: importance of dual-input blood sampling.
Munk OL; Bass L; Roelsgaard K; Bender D; Hansen SB; Keiding S
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 11337579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Chen W; Silverman DH; Delaloye S; Czernin J; Kamdar N; Pope W; Satyamurthy N; Schiepers C; Cloughesy T
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):904-11. PubMed ID: 16741298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans.
Freedman NM; Sundaram SK; Kurdziel K; Carrasquillo JA; Whatley M; Carson JM; Sellers D; Libutti SK; Yang JC; Bacharach SL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jan; 30(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 12483409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preclinical dynamic 18F-FDG PET - tumor characterization and radiotherapy response assessment by kinetic compartment analysis.
Røe K; Aleksandersen TB; Kristian A; Nilsen LB; Seierstad T; Qu H; Ree AH; Olsen DR; Malinen E
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):914-21. PubMed ID: 20831478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A curve-fitting approach to estimate the arterial plasma input function for the assessment of glucose metabolic rate and response to treatment.
Vriens D; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2009 Dec; 50(12):1933-9. PubMed ID: 19910436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplified [18F]FDG image-derived input function using the left ventricle, liver, and one venous blood sample.
Tantawy MN; Peterson TE
Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 9(2):76-86. PubMed ID: 20236605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty in measurements of ¹⁸F blood concentration and its effect on simplified dynamic PET analysis.
Sattarivand M; Borel S; Armstrong J; Kusano M; Poon I; Caldwell C
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Mar; 42(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 24480919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved derivation of input function in dynamic mouse [18F]FDG PET using bladder radioactivity kinetics.
Wong KP; Zhang X; Huang SC
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Aug; 15(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 23322346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification, Variability, and Reproducibility of Basal Skeletal Muscle Glucose Uptake in Healthy Humans Using 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Gheysens O; Postnov A; Deroose CM; Vandermeulen C; de Hoon J; Declercq R; Dennie J; Mixson L; De Lepeleire I; Van Laere K; Klimas M; Chakravarthy MV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1520-6. PubMed ID: 26229142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of 18F-FDG microPET studies in mouse tumor xenografts.
Dandekar M; Tseng JR; Gambhir SS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Apr; 48(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 17401098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An input function estimation method for FDG-PET human brain studies.
Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K
Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 34(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 17591548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
