These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21425515)

  • 1. Echogenic technology can improve needle visibility during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
    Hebard S; Hocking G
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2011; 36(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21425515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in tip visibility and nerve block parameters between two echogenic needles during a simulation study with inexperienced anesthesia trainees.
    Kilicaslan A; Topal A; Tavlan A; Erol A; Otelcioglu S
    J Anesth; 2014 Jun; 28(3):460-2. PubMed ID: 24127134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional mapping to assess direction and magnitude of needle tip error in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia.
    Hebard S; Hocking G; Murray K
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 Nov; 39(6):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22165361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compound imaging technology and echogenic needle design: effects on needle visibility and tissue imaging.
    Wiesmann T; Bornträger A; Zoremba M; Neff M; Wulf H; Steinfeldt T
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2013; 38(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 23759709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Needle echogenicity in sonographically guided regional anesthesia: blinded comparison of 4 enhanced needles and validation of visual criteria for evaluation.
    Sviggum HP; Ahn K; Dilger JA; Smith HM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 23269719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echogenic regional anaesthesia needles: a comparison study in Thiel cadavers.
    Guo S; Schwab A; McLeod G; Corner G; Cochran S; Eisma R; Soames R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):702-7. PubMed ID: 22390992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nominal logistic regression analysis of variables determining needle visibility in ultrasound images - a full factorial cadaver study.
    Dinges HC; Hoeft J; Cornelius VM; Steinfeldt T; Wiesmann T; Wulf H; Schubert AK
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):369. PubMed ID: 37950214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visibility of ultrasound-guided echogenic needle and its potential in clinical delivery of regional anesthesia.
    Miura M; Takeyama K; Suzuki T
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2014 Jul; 39(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 25027252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of beam steering on the visibility of echogenic and non-echogenic needles: a laboratory study.
    Uppal V; Sondekoppam RV; Ganapathy S
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 61(10):909-15. PubMed ID: 25053210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Beam Steering on Echogenic and Nonechogenic Needle Visibility at 40°, 50°, and 60° Needle Insertion Angles.
    Prabhakar C; Uppal V; Sondekoppam RV
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jun; 126(6):1926-1929. PubMed ID: 29116966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of the visibility and block characteristics of a stimulating needle and catheter vs an echogenic needle and catheter for sciatic nerve block with a low-frequency ultrasound probe.
    Brookes J; Sondekoppam R; Armstrong K; Uppal V; Dhir S; Terlecki M; Ganapathy S
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Dec; 115(6):912-9. PubMed ID: 26582852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced visual acuity with echogenic needles in ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block: a randomized, comparative, observer-blinded study.
    Abbal B; Choquet O; Gourari A; Bouic N; Massone A; Biboulet P; Bringuier S; Capdevila X
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Apr; 81(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 25057930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: the role of echogenic technology.
    Hocking G; Mitchell CH
    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 22825047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Needle echogenicity in ultrasound-guided lumbar spine injections: a cadaveric study.
    Gofeld M; Krashin DL; Ahn S
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(6):E725-30. PubMed ID: 24284853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sonographic identification of needle tip by specialists and novices: a blinded comparison of 5 regional block needles in fresh human cadavers.
    Edgcombe H; Hocking G
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2010; 35(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 20301826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the benefits and pitfalls of phantoms in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
    Hocking G; Hebard S; Mitchell CH
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2011; 36(2):162-70. PubMed ID: 21425513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective and subjective comparison of the visibility of three echogenic needles and a nonechogenic needle on older ultrasound devices.
    Nakagawa K; Kamiya T; Arakawa K; Akiyama S; Sakai K
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2015 Mar; 53(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25662188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrasound visibility of needles used for regional nerve block: an in vitro study.
    Schafhalter-Zoppoth I; McCulloch CE; Gray AT
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2004; 29(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 15372394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased Needle Visibility in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Liver Biopsy by an Echogenic Sheath: A Proof of Concept Study in a Human Cadaver.
    Hopstaken JS; de Jong L; Fütterer JJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):959-967. PubMed ID: 33629133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro randomized comparison of a standard and novel echogenic needle for ultrasonography-guided renal targeting.
    Nguyen V; Menhadji A; Chu R; Cho J; Osann K; Bucur P; Patel P; Okhunov Z; Lusch A; McDougall E; Landman J
    J Endourol; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1277-81. PubMed ID: 23799803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.