268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21426313)
1. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
Lix LM; Fouladi RT
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeated Measures Interaction Test with Aligned Ranks.
Kowalchuk RK; Keselman HJ; Algina J
Multivariate Behav Res; 2003 Oct; 38(4):433-61. PubMed ID: 26777442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic data with special applications to bioequivalence studies.
Powers J; Powers T
Ann Rech Vet; 1990; 21 Suppl 1():87S-92S. PubMed ID: 2080852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
Luh WM; Guo JH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing treatment effects in repeated measures designs: trimmed means and bootstrapping.
Keselman HJ; Kowalchuk RK; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2000 Nov; 53 ( Pt 2)():175-91. PubMed ID: 11109703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved statistics for contrasting means of two samples under non-normality.
Xu J; Cui X; Gupta AK
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):21-40. PubMed ID: 17908368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Traditional and proposed tests of slope homogeneity for non-normal and heteroscedastic data.
Moses TP; Klockars AJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):402-26. PubMed ID: 22053808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
Vickers AJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive robust estimation and testing.
Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR; Lix LM; Algina J; Fradette K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):267-93. PubMed ID: 17971270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A generally robust approach for testing hypotheses and setting confidence intervals for effect sizes.
Keselman HJ; Algina J; Lix LM; Wilcox RR; Deering KN
Psychol Methods; 2008 Jun; 13(2):110-29. PubMed ID: 18557681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
