These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21426313)

  • 21. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improved statistical tests for differential gene expression by shrinking variance components estimates.
    Cui X; Hwang JT; Qiu J; Blades NJ; Churchill GA
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 15618528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing for interaction in two-way random and mixed effects models: the fully nonparametric approach.
    Gaugler T; Akritas MG
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 21401567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An adaptive test of significance for a subset of regression coefficients.
    O'Gorman TW
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3527-42. PubMed ID: 12407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of covariance with pre-treatment measurements in randomized trials: comparison of equal and unequal slopes.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    Biom J; 2011 Sep; 53(5):810-21. PubMed ID: 21887795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dunnett's many-to-one test and least square means.
    Shun Z; Silverberg A; Chang CK; Ouyang P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 12635900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating clinical significance: incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests.
    van Wieringen K; Cribbie RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 23751017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A new efficient statistical test for detecting variability in the gene expression data.
    Mathur S; Dolo S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Aug; 17(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 17698928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new proposal for a principal component-based test for high-dimensional data applied to the analysis of PhyloChip data.
    Ding GC; Smalla K; Heuer H; Kropf S
    Biom J; 2012 Jan; 54(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 22170287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An age-adjusted bootstrap-based Poly-k test.
    Moon H; Ahn H; Kodell RL
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15573413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.