BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21426616)

  • 1. Does the method of administration influence the UK GMC patient questionnaire ratings?
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Dickens A
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2011 Jan; 12(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21426616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires.
    Richards SH; Campbell JL; Walshaw E; Dickens A; Greco M
    Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care.
    Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population.
    Dormandy E; Brown K; Reid EP; Marteau TM;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18237377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results.
    Campbell JL; Roberts M; Wright C; Hill J; Greco M; Taylor M; Richards S
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological challenges and approaches to improving response rates in population surveys in areas of extreme deprivation.
    Choudhury Y; Hussain I; Parsons S; Rahman A; Eldridge S; Underwood M
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 22781051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Satisfying the patient in primary care: a postal survey following a recent consultation.
    Long S; Jiwa M
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 May; 20(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 15140334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample.
    Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J
    Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration.
    Unwin E; Woolf K; Wadlow C; Dacre J
    BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e005405. PubMed ID: 25104057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys.
    Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM
    Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.
    Bowling A; Rowe G; Lambert N; Waddington M; Mahtani KR; Kenten C; Howe A; Francis SA
    Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jul; 16(30):i-xii, 1-509. PubMed ID: 22747798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of GMC performance assessments in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort analysis by country of medical qualification.
    Mehdizadeh L; Potts HW; Sturrock A; Dacre J
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 17(1):67. PubMed ID: 28372544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care].
    Bjertnaes ØA; Garratt A; Johannessen JO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1481-3. PubMed ID: 16732343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice.
    McManus IC; Gordon D; Winder BC
    Qual Health Care; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 10848365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423].
    Harrison RA; Cock D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.