These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21426616)
1. Does the method of administration influence the UK GMC patient questionnaire ratings? Richards SH; Campbell JL; Dickens A Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2011 Jan; 12(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 21426616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Campbell JL; Richards SH; Dickens A; Greco M; Narayanan A; Brearley S Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Jun; 17(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 18519625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires. Richards SH; Campbell JL; Walshaw E; Dickens A; Greco M Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):757-66. PubMed ID: 19659489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of a postal survey and mixed-mode survey using a questionnaire on patients' experiences with breast care. Zuidgeest M; Hendriks M; Koopman L; Spreeuwenberg P; Rademakers J J Med Internet Res; 2011 Sep; 13(3):e68. PubMed ID: 21946048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population. Dormandy E; Brown K; Reid EP; Marteau TM; BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18237377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with variability in the assessment of UK doctors' professionalism: analysis of survey results. Campbell JL; Roberts M; Wright C; Hill J; Greco M; Taylor M; Richards S BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6212. PubMed ID: 22034193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological challenges and approaches to improving response rates in population surveys in areas of extreme deprivation. Choudhury Y; Hussain I; Parsons S; Rahman A; Eldridge S; Underwood M Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2012 Jul; 13(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 22781051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics. Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Satisfying the patient in primary care: a postal survey following a recent consultation. Long S; Jiwa M Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 May; 20(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 15140334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PROM Validation Using Paper-Based or Online Surveys: Data Collection Methods Affect the Sociodemographic and Health Profile of the Sample. Rowen D; Carlton J; Elliott J Value Health; 2019 Aug; 22(8):845-850. PubMed ID: 31426923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration. Unwin E; Woolf K; Wadlow C; Dacre J BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e005405. PubMed ID: 25104057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations. Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Freeling P Br J Gen Pract; 1994 Jul; 44(384):297-300. PubMed ID: 8068375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes. Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Harris LE; Weinberger M; Tierney WM Med Care; 1997 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 8998204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations. Bowling A; Rowe G; Lambert N; Waddington M; Mahtani KR; Kenten C; Howe A; Francis SA Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jul; 16(30):i-xii, 1-509. PubMed ID: 22747798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence of GMC performance assessments in the United Kingdom: a retrospective cohort analysis by country of medical qualification. Mehdizadeh L; Potts HW; Sturrock A; Dacre J BMC Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 17(1):67. PubMed ID: 28372544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Data collection methods and results in user surveys in mental health care]. Bjertnaes ØA; Garratt A; Johannessen JO Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 May; 126(11):1481-3. PubMed ID: 16732343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice. McManus IC; Gordon D; Winder BC Qual Health Care; 2000 Mar; 9(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 10848365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing response to a postal survey of sedentary patients - a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN45665423]. Harrison RA; Cock D BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 15537429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]