These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21426779)

  • 1. [In vivo model to evaluate the accuracy of complete-tooth spectrophotometer for dental clinics].
    Liu F; Yang J; Xu TK; Xu MM; Ma Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 21426779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparison of shade matching accuracy of tabs of shadeguide and tabs out of shadeguide].
    Xu MM; Xu TK; Liu F; Ren SX; Feng HL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):430-2. PubMed ID: 19957578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of a dental color analysis system: the Crystaleye Spectrophotometer®.
    Odaira C; Itoh S; Ishibashi K
    J Prosthodont Res; 2011 Oct; 55(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 21296639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the accuracy of computer color matching with a new dental porcelain shade system.
    Wang J; Lin J; Gil M; Seliger A; Da Silva JD; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 24286638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeatability and reliability of human eye in visual shade selection.
    Özat PB; Tuncel İ; Eroğlu E
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Dec; 40(12):958-64. PubMed ID: 24127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The linear shade guide design of Vita 3D-master performs as well as the original design of the Vita 3D-master.
    Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Jakstat H; Moldovan O; Schwarz S; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Nov; 37(11):860-5. PubMed ID: 20633072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices.
    Tsiliagkou A; Diamantopoulou S; Papazoglou E; Kakaboura A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2016; 11(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 26835527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The influence of toothguide training box on shade matching veracity].
    Xu MM; Xu TK; Liu F; Shi XR; Feng HL
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 18(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 19760022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and accuracy of Crystaleye spectrophotometric system.
    Chen L; Tan JG; Zhou JF; Yang X; Du Y; Wang FP
    Chin J Dent Res; 2010; 13(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21264365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colour compatibility between teeth and dental shade guides in Quinquagenarians and Septuagenarians.
    Cocking C; Cevirgen E; Helling S; Oswald M; Corcodel N; Rammelsberg P; Reinelt G; Hassel AJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Nov; 36(11):848-55. PubMed ID: 19793231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repeatability of a dental shade-matching instrument when compared to traditional visual methods of shade evaluation.
    Kanawati A; Richards MW
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19903610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental color matching: A comparison between visual and instrumental methods.
    Igiel C; Weyhrauch M; Wentaschek S; Scheller H; Lehmann KM
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 26830824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer.
    Witkowski S; Yajima ND; Wolkewitz M; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):945-9. PubMed ID: 21830176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.