214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2142682)
1. Contextual control of problem behavior in students with severe disabilities.
Haring TG; Kennedy CH
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 2142682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of differential reinforcement of other behavior during dyadic instruction to reduce stereotyped behavior of autistic students.
Haring TG; Breen CG; Pitts-Conway V; Gaylord-Ross R
Am J Ment Defic; 1986 May; 90(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 3717225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of initial interval size on the efficacy of DRO schedules of reinforcement.
Repp AC; Felce D; Barton LE
Except Child; 1991; 57(5):417-25. PubMed ID: 2022233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manipulating antecedent conditions to alter the stimulus control of problem behavior.
Kennedy CH
J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 8188556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior.
Vollmer TR; Iwata BA; Zarcone JR; Smith RG; Mazaleski JL
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 8473262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maintenance of therapeutic change by momentary DRO.
Barton LE; Brulle AR; Repp AC
J Appl Behav Anal; 1986; 19(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 3771420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of DRO to movement suppression time-out and DRO with two self-injurious and aggressive mentally retarded adults.
Matson JL; Keyes JB
Res Dev Disabil; 1990; 11(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 2300683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extended reductions in stereotypic behavior of students with autism through a self-management treatment package.
Koegel RL; Koegel LK
J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 2335483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of setting events on the problem behavior of students with severe disabilities.
Kennedy CH; Itkonen T
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 8407681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach.
Carr EG; Carlson JI
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 8331013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of the reinforcement and extinction components in DRO contingencies with self-injury.
Mazaleski JL; Iwata BA; Vollmer TR; Zarcone JR; Smith RG
J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 8331012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of rules on differential reinforcement of other behavior.
Watts AC; Wilder DA; Gregory MK; Leon Y; Ditzian K
J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 24114232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reinforcement control of severe dysfunctional behavior of blind, multihandicapped students.
Luiselli JK; Myles E; Evans TP; Boyce DA
Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 4083312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.
Charlop MH; Kurtz PF; Milstein JP
J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(4):795-808. PubMed ID: 1478903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of stereotypic behaviours using differential reinforcement procedures and momentary restraint.
Barton LE; Repp AC; Brulle AR
J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Mar; 29 ( Pt 1)():71-9. PubMed ID: 4009705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects on stereotypy and other challenging behavior of matching rates of instruction to free-operant rates of responding.
Johnson JW; Van Laarhoven T; Repp AC
Res Dev Disabil; 2002; 23(4):266-84. PubMed ID: 12365851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suppression of self-stimulation: three alternative strategies.
Harris SL; Wolchik SA
J Appl Behav Anal; 1979; 12(2):185-98. PubMed ID: 489477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of DRO and DRI on rate of suppression of self-injurious behavior.
Tarpley HD; Schroeder SR
Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Sep; 84(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 158980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors.
Repp AC; Barton LE; Brulle AR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1983; 16(4):435-45. PubMed ID: 6654773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
