These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21427314)

  • 21. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
    Feder K; Grunert JH
    Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
    Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.
    Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Agasthya GA; Sechopoulos I
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(17):6920-6937. PubMed ID: 28665291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods.
    Kalbhen CL; McGill JJ; Fendley PM; Corrigan KW; Angelats J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1643-9. PubMed ID: 10584814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit.
    Bor D; Tükel S; Olgar T; Aydin E
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 14(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 18814131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Trends in compressed breast thickness and radiation dose in breast screening mammography.
    Robinson M; Kotre CJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Mar; 81(963):214-8. PubMed ID: 18270295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry.
    Tyson AH; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):569-76. PubMed ID: 19291996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography.
    Highnam RP; Brady JM; Shepstone BJ
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Jun; 71(846):646-53. PubMed ID: 9849389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Timonen M; Komssi S; Kortesniemi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 25114321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Objective models of compressed breast shapes undergoing mammography.
    Feng SS; Patel B; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031902. PubMed ID: 23464317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.
    Boone JM; Hernandez AM; Seibert JA
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):129-141. PubMed ID: 28573551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 and 1998.
    Young KC; Burch A
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Mar; 73(867):278-87. PubMed ID: 10817044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An investigation into the impact of anatomical variation upon mean glandular dose produced within a standard breast.
    Wilkinson LE; Heggie JC; Johnston PN
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Jun; 22(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 10474976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Towards proposition of a diagnostic reference level for mammographic examination in the greater Khorasan Province, Iran.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Zare H; Bayani Roodi Sh; Hashemi M; Akbari F; Malekzadeh M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jun; 155(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23209184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
    Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Numerical Model for Compressed Breast of Japanese Women in Mammography.
    Ogasawara K; Date H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2001; 21(4):215-222. PubMed ID: 12424387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.
    Dershaw DD; Fleischman RC; Liberman L; Deutch B; Abramson AF; Hann L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):559-62. PubMed ID: 8352104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.