BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21427900)

  • 1. [The centric relation-maximum intercuspation discrepancy in adult angle's class II pretreatment patients].
    Deng X; Wan Z; He SS; Wamalwa P; Chen S; Zhang ZY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21427900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Centric slide in different Angle's classes of occlusion.
    Čimić S; Badel T; Šimunković SK; Pavičin IS; Ćatić A
    Ann Anat; 2016 Jan; 203():47-51. PubMed ID: 26434757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The difference in condylar position between centric relation and centric occlusion in pretreatment Japanese orthodontic patients.
    Hidaka O; Adachi S; Takada K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12169028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of condylar positions in centric relation and centric occlusion in pre-treatment malocclusion cases.
    Afzal A; Shameem A
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Oct; 15(10):620-3. PubMed ID: 19810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the mandibular position in malocclusion patients.
    He H; Fu M
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 May; 3(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 11314339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Analysis of mandibular position of patients with angles Class I and Class II, division 1 malocclusion].
    He H; Fu M
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Sep; 36(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 11769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between centric slide and Angle's classification.
    Afzal A; Qamruddin I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Aug; 15(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 16202359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1.
    Cordray FE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 16679202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recording condylar movement with two facebow systems.
    Hicks ST; Wood DP
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 8863965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cephalometric evaluation of tongue from the rest position to centric occlusion in the subjects with class II division 1 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion.
    Verma SK; Tandon P; Agrawal DK; Prabhat KC
    J Orthod Sci; 2012 Apr; 1(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 24987623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of the centric relation bite registration technique.
    Wood DP; Elliott RW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 8060017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The relationship between centric relation-maximum intercuspation disharmony and temporomandibular dysfunction in class II patients].
    Wang YJ; Chen S; Shi AT; Wu Y; Deng X
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Mar; 44(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 23745262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation.
    Radej I; Szarmach I
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1439203. PubMed ID: 35097107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angle's Classification-A Prosthodontic Consideration: Best Evidence Consensus Statement.
    Campbell S; Goldstein G
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(S1):67-71. PubMed ID: 33331655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a deprogramming appliance to obtain centric relation records.
    Karl PJ; Foley TF
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Apr; 69(2):117-24; discussion 124-5. PubMed ID: 10227551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How a Discrepancy Between Centric Relation and Maximum Intercuspation Alters Cephalometric and Condylar Measurements.
    Parreiras Ferreira R; Isaias Seraidarian P; Santos Silveira G; Campolina Rebello Horta M; Martin Palomo J; Andrade I
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 32250125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniomandibular Articulation in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion and Class I Normal Occlusion Subjects in North Indian Population.
    Prabhat KC; Kumar Verma S; Maheshwari S; Ahmad I; Tariq M
    ISRN Dent; 2012; 2012():312031. PubMed ID: 22957261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Condylar asymmetry measurements in patients with an Angle's Class III malocclusion.
    Miller VJ; Bodner L
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Mar; 24(3):247-9. PubMed ID: 9131483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Severity of Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment Need Using the Dental Esthetic Index and Angle's Classification: A Retrospective Study.
    Alhazmi A; Alshehri M; Alrefai A; Alattas O; Arif F; Hakami S; Dowiry R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Oct; 22(10):1167-1170. PubMed ID: 35197385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships of condylar path angle with malocclusion and temporomandibular joint disturbances.
    Motoyoshi M; Inoue K; Kiuchi K; Ohya M; Nakajima A; Aramoto T; Namura S
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1993 Mar; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8326372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.