These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21427901)

  • 1. [The retractive effects of different gingival retraction agents].
    Feng YZ; Zeng XH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 29(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 21427901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Evaluation of gingival inflammation related to different retraction agents].
    Sun XW; Sun GL; Xiao LJ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 18357884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
    Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The rabbit gingival tissue response to retraction liquids and tetrahydrozoline.
    Kostić I; Mihailović D; Najman S; Stojanović S; Kostić M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 24516990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
    Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of cytotoxicity between chemical retraction agents on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro].
    Liu J; Zhang XM; Hao PJ; Hui M; Yu HY
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 27(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 19472890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Three-dimensional model analysis of the gingival sulcus width from different retraction time].
    Zhang Jj; Liu Yh; Lv Pj; Zhao Yj
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Feb; 43(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 21321624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
    Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of alpha-adrenomimetic agents for gingival retraction: A randomized crossover clinical trial.
    Mehra N; Rathi A; Sharma R; Kaushik M; Sood T
    J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):533-537. PubMed ID: 33088060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Epinephrine penetrates through gingival sulcus unlike keratinized gingiva and evokes remote vasoconstriction in human.
    Vág J; Gánti B; Mikecs B; Szabó E; Molnár B; Lohinai Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):305. PubMed ID: 33148235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).
    Kumar L; Mattoo KA; Jain S; Khalid I; Kota MZ; Baig FAH; Ibrahim M; Javali MA; Khader MA; Kanji MA
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e940098. PubMed ID: 37183802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of two gingival retraction systems on lateral gingival displacement: A prospective clinical study.
    Anupam P; Namratha N; Vibha S; Anandakrishna GN; Shally K; Singh A
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2013; 3(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 25737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of different kinds of gingival retraction agents on the polymerization inhibition of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials].
    Hou QQ; Ge H; Gao YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2023 Jun; 32(3):251-254. PubMed ID: 37803978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of new gingival retraction agents.
    Bowles WH; Tardy SJ; Vahadi A
    J Dent Res; 1991 Nov; 70(11):1447-9. PubMed ID: 1960257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
    Csillag M; Nyiri G; Vag J; Fazekas A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17280885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts.
    Nowakowska D; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Choromanska A; Raszewski Z
    Folia Biol (Praha); 2012; 58(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22464823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study on gingival retraction using mechanochemical procedure and pulsed Nd = YAG laser irradiation.
    Abdel Gabbar F; Aboulazm SF
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jan; 41(1):1001-6. PubMed ID: 9497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.