215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21428524)
1. Spatial release from masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners as a function of the temporal overlap of competing talkers.
Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Mar; 129(3):1616-25. PubMed ID: 21428524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners.
Best V; Mason CR; Kidd G; Iyer N; Brungart DS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL213-9. PubMed ID: 25698053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2895-912. PubMed ID: 24116426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial release from masking as a function of the spectral overlap of competing talkers.
Best V; Thompson ER; Mason CR; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):3677-80. PubMed ID: 23742322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.
Best V; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Roverud E; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):81. PubMed ID: 28147587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
Woodfield A; Akeroyd MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids.
Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Dillon H; Carter L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):368-75. PubMed ID: 21303017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Kreft HA; Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):901. PubMed ID: 29495696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Cohen JI
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):884-97. PubMed ID: 25698021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of fundamental frequency and vocal-tract length cues on sentence segregation by listeners with hearing loss.
Mackersie CL; Dewey J; Guthrie LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):1006-19. PubMed ID: 21877813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
