These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21428524)

  • 21. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.
    Jin SH; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):881-9. PubMed ID: 20707457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Peripheral hearing loss reduces the ability of children to direct selective attention during multi-talker listening.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():160-172. PubMed ID: 28505526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of high-rate envelope speech cues and their perceptually relevant dynamic range for the hearing impaired.
    Stone MA; Anton K; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1141-51. PubMed ID: 22894233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determining the energetic and informational components of speech-on-speech masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Roverud E; Swaminathan J; Jennings T; Clayton K; Steven Colburn H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):440. PubMed ID: 30710924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of early and late reflections on spatial release from masking: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Srinivasan NK; Stansell M; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL185. PubMed ID: 28372125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Chevalier J; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3625-33. PubMed ID: 21218894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20649220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of non-spatial factors on measures of spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Marrone N; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):3103-10. PubMed ID: 22501083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An energetic limit on spatial release from masking.
    Best V; Thompson ER; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 23649712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
    Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.