These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21428524)

  • 41. The role of interaural differences on speech intelligibility in complex multi-talker environments.
    Ellinger RL; Jakien KM; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):EL170. PubMed ID: 28253635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Examination of a hybrid beamformer that preserves auditory spatial cues.
    Best V; Roverud E; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL369. PubMed ID: 29092558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G; Gallun FJ; Leek MR; Bernstein JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
    Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Recognition of asynchronous auditory-visual speech by younger and older listeners: A preliminary study.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Willison HM; Freund MS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):151. PubMed ID: 28764460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
    Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Venezia JH; Leek MR; Lindeman MP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Refining a model of hearing impairment using speech psychophysics.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T; Ghitza O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):EL179-85. PubMed ID: 25236151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech.
    Asp F; Reinfeldt S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31356386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Keidser G; Freeston K; Buchholz JM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):221-229. PubMed ID: 28826285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3884-96. PubMed ID: 21682411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.