These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21428738)

  • 1. Mammography result notification letters: are they easy to read and understand?
    Marcus EN; Sanders LM; Pereyra M; Del Toro Y; Romilly AP; Yepes M; Hooper MW; Jones BA
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Apr; 20(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 21428738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Índice Flesch-Szigriszt and Spanish Lexile Analyzer to evaluate Spanish patient education materials in otolaryngology.
    Nassif SJ; Wong K; Levi JR
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Jan; 128(1):E21-E26. PubMed ID: 28990667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.
    Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Density Notification Letters and Websites: Are They Too "Dense"?
    Saraiya A; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 May; 16(5):717-723. PubMed ID: 30686686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
    Paasche-Orlow MK; Taylor HA; Brancati FL
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Feb; 348(8):721-6. PubMed ID: 12594317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.
    Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them?
    Todhunter SL; Clamp PJ; Gillett S; Pothier DD
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Mar; 124(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 19954560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases.
    Rhee RL; Von Feldt JM; Schumacher HR; Merkel PA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2013 Oct; 65(10):1702-6. PubMed ID: 23687011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening.
    Tian C; Champlin S; Mackert M; Lazard A; Agrawal D
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 24674352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability levels of individualized family service plans.
    Pizur-Barnekow K; Patrick T; Rhyner PM; Folk L; Anderson K
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2010 Aug; 30(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20608861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health literacy and the readability of written information for hormone therapies.
    Charbonneau DH
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2013; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 23631626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.
    Amini H; Casamassimo PS; Lin HL; Hayes JR
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18027780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org.
    Hansberry DR; John A; John E; Agarwal N; Gonzales SF; Baker SR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):566-75. PubMed ID: 24555593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability, suitability, and characteristics of asthma action plans: examination of factors that may impair understanding.
    Yin HS; Gupta RS; Tomopoulos S; Wolf MS; Mendelsohn AL; Antler L; Sanchez DC; Lau CH; Dreyer BP
    Pediatrics; 2013 Jan; 131(1):e116-26. PubMed ID: 23209106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability of discharge summaries: with what level of information are we dismissing our patients?
    Choudhry AJ; Baghdadi YM; Wagie AE; Habermann EB; Heller SF; Jenkins DH; Cullinane DC; Zielinski MD
    Am J Surg; 2016 Mar; 211(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 26794665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.