These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429096)

  • 1. Assessing population structure: F(ST) and related measures.
    Meirmans PG; Hedrick PW
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 21429096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring population differentiation using GST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions.
    Leng L; Zhang DE
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jun; 20(12):2494-509. PubMed ID: 21557781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. G'ST and D do not replace FST.
    Whitlock MC
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Mar; 20(6):1083-91. PubMed ID: 21375616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Beta-mixture model for assessing genetic population structure.
    Fu R; Dey DK; Holsinger KE
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1073-82. PubMed ID: 21114661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative performance of single nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite markers for population genetic analysis.
    Coates BS; Sumerford DV; Miller NJ; Kim KS; Sappington TW; Siegfried BD; Lewis LC
    J Hered; 2009; 100(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 19525239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. If F(ST) does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with Q(ST) is misleading. Or is it?
    Edelaar P; Björklund M
    Mol Ecol; 2011 May; 20(9):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21410574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Riverine status and genetic structure of Chilika buffalo of eastern India as inferred from cytogenetic and molecular marker-based analysis.
    Mishra BP; Kataria RS; Bulandi SS; Prakash B; Kathiravan P; Mukesh M; Sadana DK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Feb; 126(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 19207933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics!
    Gerlach G; Jueterbock A; Kraemer P; Deppermann J; Harmand P
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(18):3845-52. PubMed ID: 20735737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population genetic variation in the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis).
    Bruggeman DJ; Wiegand T; Fernández N
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Sep; 19(17):3679-91. PubMed ID: 20618895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of quantitative and molecular genetic variation of native vs. invasive populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L., Lythraceae).
    Chun YJ; Nason JD; Moloney KA
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(14):3020-35. PubMed ID: 19548895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. F-statistics of clonal diploids structured in numerous demes.
    De Meeûs T; Balloux F
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Aug; 14(9):2695-702. PubMed ID: 16029471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the measurements of genetic differentiation among populations.
    Wang J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Oct; 94(5):275-89. PubMed ID: 23298450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating population structure from AFLP amplification intensity.
    Foll M; Fischer MC; Heckel G; Excoffier L
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(21):4638-47. PubMed ID: 20874760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is genetic differentiation, and how should we measure it--GST, D, neither or both?
    Verity R; Nichols RA
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Sep; 23(17):4216-25. PubMed ID: 25039308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SNP-based analysis of genetic substructure in the German population.
    Steffens M; Lamina C; Illig T; Bettecken T; Vogler R; Entz P; Suk EK; Toliat MR; Klopp N; Caliebe A; König IR; Köhler K; Ludemann J; Diaz Lacava A; Fimmers R; Lichtner P; Ziegler A; Wolf A; Krawczak M; Nūrnberg P; Hampe J; Schreiber S; Meitinger T; Wichmann HE; Roeder K; Wienker TF; Baur MP
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17003564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple allelic-phenotype diversity and differentiation statistics for allopolyploids.
    Obbard DJ; Harris SA; Pannell JR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Oct; 97(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 16823402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of Fst for the island model.
    Rottenstreich S; Hamilton MB; Miller JR
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Dec; 72(4):485-503. PubMed ID: 17920093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. G(ST) is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation - a comment on Jost's D.
    Ryman N; Leimar O
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2084-7; discussion 2088-91. PubMed ID: 19389168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The seabird paradox: dispersal, genetic structure and population dynamics in a highly mobile, but philopatric albatross species.
    Milot E; Weimerskirch H; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(7):1658-73. PubMed ID: 18331243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does GST underestimate genetic differentiation from marker data?
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jul; 24(14):3546-58. PubMed ID: 25891752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.